Another attempt by the shorts

[Mountainbiker]

At $0.01 page view, there is money to be made here writing for SA on NQ. You notice that there are more comments on Negavtive articles vs Positive articles except for Toro's.

That is why a number of writers are bashing NQ for their own gain even though the article yesterday regarding the Cash is so ridiculous. Go to China or call SC HQ and verify it, EOM before putting that article on SA.

[admin]

With that much money transferred, wouldn't SC at the minimum ask some questions, or even if not, would they not be aware what's going on with NQ?

That is, even if it is a fraud, would SC not have to be complicit?

[Mountainbiker]

Justin Gilles put out a Bullish article on SA this am, so far a few comments vs 180 for the Cash article. This tells you a Bearish article gets paid better than a Bullish one..lol.

[admin]

Justin Gilles put out a Bullish article on SA this am, so far a few comments vs 180 for the Cash article. This tells you a Bearish article gets paid better than a Bullish one..lol.

Not necessarily. The difference is the result of the article being way less controversial and more factual, well done Justin!

[Mountainbiker]

Justin Gilles put out a Bullish article on SA this am, so far a few comments vs 180 for the Cash article. This tells you a Bearish article gets paid better than a Bullish one..lol.

Not necessarily. The difference is the result of the article being way less controversial and more factual, well done Justin!

Admin, I was referring to the $0.01 page view. You get paid more with a Bearish one because many LONGs can defend it.

[admin]

["Admin, I was referring to the $0.01 page view. You get paid more with a Bearish one because many LONGs can defend it."]

I know, but the number of comments is an imperfect proxy on page views..