Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Smoke and Mirrors
#41

Katytrader did a great job of answering that question when I asked.  The quick answer is no, they don't scrap the terms of the original SPA which include the milestone payments schedule you refer to.  When/if XOM buys IOC, part of what they buy is our contractual agreements, in this case, our Sale and Purchase Agreement with Total.

However, if the terms of that original SPA include an out for Total's payments then, that's another thing.  My understanding is that no one on this board has a copy of that SPA.  We don't know all the terms.

Also, I'm told, that XOM and Total are free to renegotiate any of the terms.  But, that would be the exception to the norm.  Hard to know why XOM would negotiate away maybe, $2 billion.

How'd I do, Prof.?  Corrections and additions would be instructive.

for our cause
Reply

#42

'Li'loilady' pid='74495' d Wrote:

Katytrader did a great job of answering that question when I asked.  The quick answer is no, they don't scrap the terms of the original SPA which include the milestone payments schedule you refer to.  When/if XOM buys IOC, part of what they buy is our contractual agreements, in this case, our Sale and Purchase Agreement with Total.

However, if the terms of that original SPA include an out for Total's payments then, that's another thing.  My understanding is that no one on this board has a copy of that SPA.  We don't know all the terms.

Also, I'm told, that XOM and Total are free to renegotiate any of the terms.  But, that would be the exception to the norm.  Hard to know why XOM would negotiate away maybe, $2 billion.

How'd I do, Prof.?  Corrections and additions would be instructive.

I am here to serve, Lil

Attached is the IOC/TOTAL SPA - - - the Transformational Document as it were, Snagglepuss



Attached Files
.docx   FINAL IOC-TOT Share SPA - PART 1.docx (Size: 428.46 KB / Downloads: 7)
.pdf   FINAL IOC-TOT Share SPA - PART 2.pdf (Size: 851.63 KB / Downloads: 12)
Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply

#43

Well thank you, kind sir.  Do you work for the CIA?

for our cause
Reply

#44
No

Retired from the FBI
https://www.amazon.co.uk/FBI-Federal-Ins...B002ART052
Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply

#45

(07-20-2016, 11:10 PM)kommonsents Wrote:

(07-20-2016, 10:46 PM)ArtM72 Wrote:

(07-20-2016, 10:24 PM)kommonsents Wrote:

(07-20-2016, 05:39 PM)oliver.gump Wrote:

(07-20-2016, 01:30 PM)AU74 Wrote: Not Pinkie. We ditch him and put PMs team back together.

I like how you think!

And how much revenue did PM and his team bring into IOC coffers?

All of it.

Perhaps you can enlighten us, Art, by listing all the events of monetization brought in by PM.  I'm having trouble recollecting those events.  I thought he was terminated by the then BOD because he could not monetize the IOC discoveries.

First, everything that Hession hasn't already sold came from Mulacek and his team.  There isn't any Interoil asset that wasn't the direct result of actions taken by Mulacek.  Examples?  You can start with the refinery and retail businesses. Pacific Rubiales. Partnerships with companies like Mitsui and Samsung.  Effective recapitilization, oversubscribed at $75/share.

Sure, things went south, due in significant part to the Great Recession, a PNG Constitutional crisis and the rise to power of Duma. Hession has on the other hand closed with Total on a contract that he seems determined to undermine.

I wish I could say "you can't sell what you don't have".  That would be my strongest arguement. Unfortunately selling what you don't have trick is now a major driver of today's markets.

Reply

#46

'oliver.gump' pid='74488' datel Wrote:

'kommonsents' pid='74376' datel Wrote:

'ArtM72' pid='74371' datel Wrote:

'kommonsents' pid='74366' datel Wrote:

'oliver.gump' pid='74338' datel Wrote:

I like how you think!

And how much revenue did PM and his team bring into IOC coffers?

All of it.

Perhaps you can enlighten us, Art, by listing all the events of monetization brought in by PM.  I'm having trouble recollecting those events.  I thought he was terminated by the then BOD because he could not monetize the IOC discoveries.

The Market Cap as at PM's leaving the company is a direct reflection on his performance as a CEO. Ditto for the current Market Cap as a reflection on the worth of Slippery Mike as a CEO.

PM was heavily invested in IOC, and his interests were ALWAYS alligned with building shareholder equity. Contrast this with Teflon Hession who's only market purchase of shares in IOC was in Mid January, when he was part of the OSH deal negotiations and had inside information that a deal announcement would spike the PPS. 

PM was a visionary and a builder, Dr. Pinkie has demonstrated himself to be a destroyer and an Inside Trader.

Oliver- Hear,here !!! You have again "hit the nail on the head" . It appears that some on this board have forgotten what Hession did to our pps in early December of 2013 !

 [ How soon they forget !! ]  Truly sad .

Reply

#47

'ArtM72' pid='74556' datel Wrote:

'kommonsents' pid='74376' datel Wrote:

'ArtM72' pid='74371' datel Wrote:

'kommonsents' pid='74366' datel Wrote:

'oliver.gump' pid='74338' datel Wrote:

I like how you think!

And how much revenue did PM and his team bring into IOC coffers?

All of it.

Perhaps you can enlighten us, Art, by listing all the events of monetization brought in by PM.  I'm having trouble recollecting those events.  I thought he was terminated by the then BOD because he could not monetize the IOC discoveries.

First, everything that Hession hasn't already sold came from Mulacek and his team.  There isn't any Interoil asset that wasn't the direct result of actions taken by Mulacek.  Examples?  You can start with the refinery and retail businesses. Pacific Rubiales. Partnerships with companies like Mitsui and Samsung.  Effective recapitilization, oversubscribed at $75/share.

Sure, things went south, due in significant part to the Great Recession, a PNG Constitutional crisis and the rise to power of Duma. Hession has on the other hand closed with Total on a contract that he seems determined to undermine.

I wish I could say "you can't sell what you don't have".  That would be my strongest arguement. Unfortunately the selling what you don't have trick is now a major driver of today's markets.

The question was and is, what did PM monetize.  Most all of us know the discoveries were made under his leadership.  We also know he was terminated because he could not and did not monetize the discoveries.

Reply

#48
It is very difficult for me to see through the smoke and mirrors but let me try once again.

As you know Total has bought 40.1% of Elk/Antelope (PRL-15) from IOC. Keep that 40.1% in mind for you will see it again. Total has bought 40.1% but they have not paid for it yet. So far they have only paid IOC $401 million dollars. I will ignore what they have paid for the carry of three wells since it is mostly recoverable to them from other payments to be made to IOC.

Let’s figure out what Total agreed to pay IOC under the SPA. Please look at the IOC presentation at:
http://tinyurl.com/z4yzgue page 16. Let’s just figure out what Total has agreed to pay IOC up through certification. They agreed to pay according to the following:
Completion payment of $401 million plus

Less than 3.5 TCFe - Zero
3.5 - 5.4 TCFe - $0.60/MCF (US$457 million to be paid at FID).
5.4 - 6.5 TCFe - $0.80/MCF
6.5 TCFe and above- $1.00/MCF

We can see here that everything above 6.5 TCF is to be paid at $1.00/MCF.

Now using the above mentioned chart on page 16 let’s figure out what the Total SPA is worth to IOC up through certification not including the FID payment. So under this scenario we start getting paid at the 5.4 TCF level. From the chart you will see that the completion payment is $401 million. You will also note that each TCF above 6.5 TCF is worth $401 million/TCF. So if we take from the chart the payment for completion and add the certification payment we have what Total will have to pay up through certification. (If they never reach FID on Paupa LNG there will never be an FID payment or a first cargo payment.) They have already paid the completion payment but none of the certification payment. So what Exxon is really buying is the 36.54% of Elk/Antelope that IOC still owns plus the receivables from Total.

Total agreed to pay as shown below:

Gross Resource Level         40.1% of Gross       Amount            Price/MCF
                                                                            To be paid
         7.5 TCF                             3.0 TCF              $1155 mil.         $0.385/MCF
         8.5 TCF                             3.41 TCF            $1557 mil.         $0.457/MCF
         9.5 TCF                             3.81 TCF             $1958 mil.       $0.514/MCF
        10.5 TCF                            4.21 TCF             $2359 mil.        $0.560/MCF

The average is 9 TCF gross, 3.61 TCF net, $1757 mil and a average price of $0.487/MCF. Keep that $0.48/price in mind for later use. The above is what Total agreed to pay (up through certification) for 40.1% of the field.

IOC still owns 36.54% of the field so what would that be worth under the same pricing scheme? 36.54/40.1 = 0.91 or 91% of the above numbers.

Gross Resource Level                36.54 % of Gross    Amount       Price/MCF
                                                                                   To be paid
         7.5 TCF                                   2.74 TCF             $1051 mil.       $0.384/MCF
         8.5 TCF                                   3.11 TCF             $1417 mil.       $0.456/MCF
         9.5 TCF                                   3.47 TCF             $1782 mil.       $0.514/MCF
        10.5 TCF                                  3.84 TCF             $2147 mil.        $0.559/MCF

The average is 9TCF gross, 3.29 TCF net, $1599 mil. and $0.486/MCF.

Now what Exxon is buying is the 36.54% that IOC still owns plus the receivables due from Total. So if we combine the two Tables above but subtract the $401 million that Total has already paid we will get the following:

Gross Resource Level            76.64 % of Gross        Amount       Price/MCF
                                                                                   To be paid
         7.5 TCF                                5.75 TCF                $1805 mil     $0.314/MCF
         8.5 TCF                                6.51 TCF                $2573 mil     $0.395/MCF          
         9.5 TCF                                7.28 TCF                $3339 mil     $0.459/MCF
        10.5 TCF                               8.05 TCF                $4105 mil     $0.510/MCF
The average is 9 TCF gross, 6.90 TCF net, $2956 mil and $0.428/MCF. A case could be made for leaving the $401 million in the calculation since that should be a part of the value of IOC, in which the price would return to $0.48/MCF.
Just for comparison purposes let’s look at the OSH bid. I think the $40.25/share payment is meant to pay IOC shareholders for the first 6.2 TCF and the CVR in meant to replace the “upside” given in the Total/IOC SPA agreement.
The OSH bid was $40.25/sh (in OSH shares)  plus $6.044/sh/TCF above 6.2 TCF.
The OSH bid of $40.25/share x 51.1 million shares = $2057 million for the first 6.2 TCF gross. They bid $0.77/MCF for the gas above 6.2 TCF gross. For comparison purposes:
The SPA was $1.00/MCF for gas above 6.5 TCF. One TCF would be valued at $1 Billion gross. Under the OSH deal the $0.77/MCF above 6.2 TCF gross would be valued at $770 million/TCF and under the Exxon deal the gas above 6.2 TCF gross would be valued at $0.90/MCF or $900 million/TCF. To bring this to a net basis we have to use the Total percentage of 40.1%. In the case of OSH the calculation would be $770 million/51.1 million shares x 0.401 = $6.044/share/TCF.
In the case of the Exxon bid at $0.90/MCF the calculation would be $900 million/51.1 million shares x 0.401 = $7.07/share/TCF.
In the case of the SPA agreement the calculation at $1.00/MCF would be $1,000 million/51.1 million shares x 0.401 = $7.85/sh/TCF.
Now back to the OSH bid of $2057 million for the first 6.2 TCF and $6.044/share/TCF. If we continue with the idea that they are bidding or IOC’s 36.54% plus the receivables from the Total sale (40.1%) they are really bidding for 76.64% of the field and expectation of a payment from Total after certification. The value would look something like this:
Gross Resource Level            76.64 % of Gross         Amount      Price/MCF
                                                                                  To be paid
      6.2 TCF                                4.75 TCF                    $2057 mil     $0.43/MCF
      7.2 TCF                                5.52 TCF                    $2365 mil     $0.43/MCF
      8.2 TCF                                6.28 TCF                    $2674 mil     $0.43/MCF
      9.2 TCF                                7.05 TCF                    $2983 mil     $0.42/MCF
    10.2 TCF                                7.82 TCF                   $3291 mil     $0.42/MCF
How does the Exxon deal compare? They are offering $45/sh in Exxon stock plus $7.07/sh/TCF above 6.2 TCF.   $45/sh x 51.1 million shares = $2299.5 million.
Gross Resource Level      76.64 % of Gross      Amount          Price/MCF
                                                                           To be paid
       6.2 TCF                           4.75 TCF              $2299.5 mil       $0.48/MCF
       7.2 TCF                           5.52 TCF              $2661 mil          $0.48/MCF
       8.2 TCF                           6.28 TCF             $3035 mil           $0.48/MCF
       9.2 TCF                           7.05 TCF              $3383 mil          $0.48/MCF
     10.0 TCF Cap                   7.66 TCF              $3672 mil           $0.48/MCF

Exxon should get a payment from Total as follows:

Gross Resource Level              Payment US$             Cumulative Payment US$
     5.4 TCF to 6.2 TCF                  $257 mil                         $257 mil
     6.2 TCF to 7.2 TCF                  $377mil                          $634 mil
     7.2 TCF to 8.2 TCF                  $401 mil                         $1035 mil
     8.2 TCF to 9.2 TCF                  $401 mil                         $1436 mil
     9.2 TCF to 10.2 TCF (no cap)  $401 mil                         $1837 mil

Will continue to get $401 million/TCF to whatever the certified number is.

Example: at 9.2 TCF it would cost Exxon $3383 - $1436 = $1947 mil to acquire IOC’s 36.54% of Elk/Antelope or a total of 3.36 TCF for $1947 mil. Or $.58/MCF. I am lost here as to how I handled the $401 mil completion payment. Maybe some of you accountants can figure it out for me. If I deduct $401 mil from $1947 mil I get $1546 mil which would be $0.46/MCF which is in line with the numbers above.
Of course Total will retain their 40.1%  but they will have to pay Exxon to complete their buy-in/
I am sure there are errors somewhere above so feel free to make corrections. Sorry about the length and rambling nature of this post. Hopefully someone will benefit.

ps: I guess the point I am trying to make here is that I think I see the basis of the Exxon bid. They used the same average gas price as the Total SPA but started at a higher level (6.2 TCF) and paid less/MCF ie  $0.90/MCF instead of $1/MCF. So the Exxon bid is still worth less to IOC than the Total SPA. Plus the SPA had no upside cap, an FID payment, a first cargo payment and another certification after producion has commenced. OSH did the same thing but with a lower gas price and a lower CVR/CRP payment. So the Exxon deal is superior to the OSH deal.
Reply

#49

Pet - Thank you sir for your fine post . For me,it helps me to arrive at a simple conclusion :  what we have here in our leases is one hell-of a lot of "milk and honey" .Combine Hession's greed and to me a lack of competence, with Rex T's past with XTO (he was accused of overpaying), they will be the biggest beneficiaries of our "milk and honey".

As I stated a couple of years back, Exxon could easily see the path that MH was on ,so all they had to do was wait (in the bushes) . Of course,the bigger than expected drop in crude prices and length of time staying low, helped them even more .

Your brilliant analysis work over the years is greatly appreciated . The road has been a lot 'bumpier' than I ever thought it would be .Best to you .

Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: