Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"The company did not put a deadline on the sale process."
#21
Basically No one can predict the PPS movement in this stock at this point. It will pop up fast to reach the perceived real NAV once several things happen. This can happen during "radio silence" as well. Like many here have said, do not use margin and do not use options because you cant time this thing.

I do believe we will see an increase in the next week or so. But that is not based on much more then a hunch and the accumulation of different forces taht are coming together at this time.

Till then this is just banter. No one knows anything and this is good. This deal will happen fast. Hold on.
Reply

#22
Turn's out Phil's "string theory" wasn't so far out as it seemed at the time.. Smile
Reply

#23

'admin' pid='19851' datel Wrote:Turn's out Phil's "string theory" wasn't so far out as it seemed at the time.. Smile

Maybe they should have stated they would evaluate in March, April, and maybe May because we can.

Reply

#24
I hate to sound like a short but this IOC sell down process has really been going on for years. If you get frustrated by IOC's low valuation do what I do - sell puts. The April put premiums are still good with only three weeks to go. That is money in your account while you wait.

I have sold 126 IOC puts over the last few years with 114 expiring worthless. This put premium then gets invested in ITM IOC LEAP calls. Waiting for IOC has been very good to me and I have no right to complain about delays.
Reply

#25

Like you, TA, I am long the stock and short the puts. I had 85 puts expire worthless in the last two weeks of March and have sold 75 for April expiry thus far. Have been doing this for the last two years and believe IOC puts to be my best money-maker ever, a period of some decades. This approach isn´t for everyone, but it sure beats worrying about delays over which one has no control.

Reply

#26
Welcome aboard, katytrader!
Reply

#27

'katytrader' pid='19858' datel Wrote:Like you, TA, I am long the stock and short the puts. I had 85 puts expire worthless in the last two weeks of March and have sold 75 for April expiry thus far. Have been doing this for the last two years and believe IOC puts to be my best money-maker ever, a period of some decades. This approach isn´t for everyone, but it sure beats worrying about delays over which one has no control.

Welcome Katytrader. The key to put selling IMO is to not overleverage yourself which is why it has such a negative reputation. I only sell cash secured puts that I am ready and willing to take delivery on (even though I rarely do).

Reply

#28

'admin' pid='19859' datel Wrote:Welcome aboard, katytrader!

katytrader welsome.I am short the June $65 puts. Looks like good risk reward. Not a lot just a touch .

Reply

#29
Thanks for the welcomes. Admin had to work overtime to untangle my registration process. On the puts, I tend to write closer to the money, i.e. 70s at the present time, but am more conservative in the kids´ IRA accounts. As I write I am trying to help a friend understand writing covered calls, so I have had to step back to appreciate that what I look at and process quickly (but not perfectly) is a painful process for those without experience.
Reply

#30

'Tree' pid='19087' datel Wrote:

InterOil has received final binding offers from potential partners for the Gulf liquefied natural gas project in Papua New Guinea, and is also claiming to have boosted the project’s gas reserves by 10%.

Final bids were submitted on 28 February, and the US-based player re­iterated that interest was shown by international oil companies, national oil companies and global utility companies.

InterOil did not disclose how many final offers were ­received, saying only that “several” bids had been received.

The project must introduce a recognised international operator in order to receive the PNG government’s final approval to proceed.

“I know that you are all awaiting the announcements on the asset sell-down process, and I can assure you that we are all excited about our future, especially given the certified resources that we have,” said InterOil’s chief financial officer Collin Francis Visaggio.

“Our board intends to meet our advisors during March for the purpose of evaluating the proposals received and selecting our partner for the development of the LNG project.

“The asset sell-down, once completed, will fund the Gulf LNG project and our longer-term exploration programme,” said Visaggio.

The company did not put a deadline on the sale process.

The project’s current shape — as provisionally approved by the government in November 2012 — involves a single onshore train of 3.8 million tonnes per annum of LNG, coming on stream in 2016, followed by a second identical train two years later.

InterOil’s most recent capital cost guidance for two trains was between $8.3 billion and $9.3 billion.

The Canadian company has battled against market pessimism about the project for years, but Interoil has always believed in its feedstock — the Elk-Antelope fields — and has been drilling wells regularly in support of this.

Chief executive Phil Mulacek said that, based on the two wells drilled last year, Antelope-3 and Triceratops-2, a new independent reserves report by GLJ Petroleum Consultants gave the Elk-Antelope and Triceratops fields a best-case contingent resource of 9.45 trillion cubic feet of gas and 143.6 million barrels of condensate, 10% higher than previously.

InterOil’s latest drilling rig, Rig 3, is now rigged up and on location at the Elk-3 well.

Huh, turns out there are 2 MFIC's - at least.

Another instructive thread.

Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)