Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Admin - Great article!
#1

Thanks! Comprehensive and compelling.

Check one item, though... unless I'm mistaken, I think the figure for NationSky 3rd qrt should read $15.3 and not $50.3 million.  Again, I could be wrong, but I think there was an error having to do with the transcription of the investor day presentation.

Reply

#2
Thanks. I remember wondering about that but anyway, the essence is the fast growth, if they keep on growing they will reach that $50m sometime. I'll look into it.
Reply

#3
Yes, you're right of course, it's $15.3, not $50.3 but still, that Q3 revenue is larger than the whole of 2012..
Reply

#4

'admin' pid='32633' datel Wrote:Yes, you're right of course, it's $15.3, not $50.3 but still, that Q3 revenue is larger than the whole of 2012..

Great summary of events post MW's attacks in bad faith. Hope both longs and shorts read the transcript and also listen to the Analyst/Investors webcast.

Reply

#5

admin dateline='<a href="tel:1385732699">1385732699</a>' Wrote: Thanks. I remember wondering about that but anyway, the essence is the fast growth, if they keep on growing they will reach that $50m sometime. I'll look into it.

Well it would have been fine by me and playing by the apparent "new rules" if you had purposely inflated a bunch more numbers, skewed the known facts and just made some stuff up like started the rumor Jim Cramer says NQ us a STRONG SELL (a known powerful inverse indicator).   I was expecting the first comment to be "i object to this article on the grounds that it is severely damaging to my case".  Honestly it seems like the shorts have exhausted every argument up to and possibly including "cause I said so".  I can honestly say i've never seen anyone write something as ridiculous as Pablos's article about the cash (and even more shameful that SA has become a bottomfeeder who would publish it), his argument applied equally to anything he hasn't personally seen and touched such as Alaska, Mars, good judgement.

One last thing (really this time haha)..  The over-heated short hype and emotional mud slinging reminds me a lot of the ride up with BIDU 4000% or so if I remember correctly..  I held tight to that one too.

Reply

#6
SA is retarded, especially the Portugese guy who kept claiming that each shares short creates a long share because the short share has to pay "dividends." I posted a comment clearly showing why he's wrong and SA won't publish it.
Reply

#7

Good work Admin.

Found a link from few months back, not as comprehensive as Articels on SA:

http://www.8ip.asia/stock-talk-nq-mobile/

Reply

#8

'kevinh' pid='32643' datel Wrote:SA is retarded, especially the Portugese guy who kept claiming that each shares short creates a long share because the short share has to pay "dividends." I posted a comment clearly showing why he's wrong and SA won't publish it.

I believe you have to be a paying member for your stuff to be posted without being reviewed. It has had happened to a number of my comments.

Reply

#9
["I believe you have to be a paying member for your stuff to be posted"]

No, I don't believe that's true, I think anyone who's registered can post comments, but they have some rules for them.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)