(03-13-2015, 10:17 AM)Stavros Wrote: What's your problem Getit? Don't you have IR's email address? All you have too do is contact them and ask the questions. You will be surprised when you get answers that are nearly 180 degrees opposite two your ruminations that you post here. When I questioned them regarding drilling results they also gave me the same answer, to wit: "The drilling results you refer to were not issued by IOC. They were disseminated by Oil Search in a Press Release. We have no control over, and no comment on, the content of their PRs. We don't view interim drilling results, drilling delays, flash fires, rig damage or government-imposed stoppages as being material information to our shareholders or the investing world. This is because Antelope 4 is not on the critical path. We believe that all timelines for certification of the PRL15 assets, and subsequent payments from TOTAL, are still valid .... etc "
Thank you for the additional information, Stavros; that gives me the better understanding I was seeking. However, not saying that you have (don't recall), but just in case for the future, you should never accuse me of being condescending to anyone, since that would be hypocritical of you. I not only have both their email addresses, I have used them more than once, and posted some of the information. I did not care to send them an email about the drilling results and explanations/comments already posted.
I would be interested in knowing which two of my "ruminations" they contradict. I would not know which ones to ask them about in that regard.
Obviously, from the response you got I appreciate your posting, their not publishing their own information or comment was not because OSH already had, as implied by someone else, but simply because of their own policies and procedures and interpretation of materiality. Therefore, I do not see that as an indication that "something is broken internally", as stated by someone else, even if you disagree with the policy, as I also do to some extent.
What I also find interesting from this and previous information is that it appears OSH issued incomplete and inaccurate information on IOC drilling and suspension, and apparently with negative ulterior motives. IOC, however, consistently, is still not commenting on it because of their general policy on materiality and specific policy against commenting on OSH, or other company, PRs; they are being consistent and taking the high road, like it or not. I guess winning, ultimately, and perhaps avoiding public disputes when possible, is more important.