Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New China LNG import terminal to open Dec
#1


Sinopec to Commission LNG Terminal at Beihai City by December End





Sinopec Group, parent company of Sinopec Corp., is likely to commission its LNG receiving terminal at Beihai city of south China's Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region by end of December.

The company will also build 1,318 km of natural gas pipelines covering ten cities in Guangxi as well as Zhanjiang and Maoming city in Guangdong province, Xinhua Finance Agency reported Thursday.

The terminal has a handling capacity of 3 million tons which will rise to 6 million tons by 2017.

The project is jointly invested by Sinopec Group, Guangxi Investment Group and Guangxi Beibu Gulf International Port Group.

Reply

#2

Great potential for China as they have many good plans for building more LNG import terminals. Market forces will determine whether they all get built and whether LNG as fuel for shipping pans out. Cautious optimism for my very long IOC shares. Hope IOC mgmt is sucking up to Chinese buyers big-time.

Thursday October 15, 2015
China Could be the "Next Big Thing" for LNG Bunkers

Craig Eason, writing for Lloyd's List, says although challenges still exist, Chinese policies could spur the adoption on LNG as a main shipping fuel.

Chinese policies that promote gas powered coastal shipping could mean the country is "the next big thing" for liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkers, says Craig Eason, writing in a recent blog for Lloyd's List.

Eason notes that China, like Europe, has indicated it will give state support to gas-fuelled shipping, a factor that so far has been key to both the development of LNG bunkering infrastructure and uptake of the fuel.

Singapore-based consultant Tri-Zen also recently noted that China's policy decisions have paired a demand for increased gas imports with a push for more gas powered shipping, a combination that could assist with LNG becoming a more dominant fuel.

Further, China LNG Group Limited (China LNG) is reported to have signed co-operation agreements with nine Chinese shipyards, valued at around $754 million, for the financing, manufacturing, and retrofitting of LNG-fuelled vessels, in addition to the development of Chinese LNG and "clean diesel" bunker stations.

As part of its energy strategy, China is reported to be planning to build 23 LNG import terminals, a move that Tri-Zen says will assist in the development of Chinese gas bunkering infrastructure.

However such developments have yet to convince international shipowners that LNG is a viable fuel for them, says Eason, as "owners remain wary of infrastructure shortcomings and relative fuel prices along with the additional newbuilding costs."

LNG fuel for shipping is only going to be a global phenomenon once there is commercial gas demand ashore and a global bunkering network.

Craig Eason, Aronnax, Lloyd's List

"LNG fuel for shipping is only going to be a global phenomenon once there is commercial gas demand ashore and a global bunkering network."

Eason argues that a large price change in both oil and coal will be needed for gas to become a more mainstream energy source, but notes that the point at which gas will find its worth over other fuel sources varies between regions.

Last week, Ship & Bunker reported that Richard Colwall, Managing Director at BMT Asia Pacific Ltd. (BMT Asia Pacific) believes China's Ship and Port Pollution Prevention Special Action Plan (SPPSAP) will be the key driver for the adoption of LNG as marine fuel in Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta (PRD).

Reply

#3
LNG needs more terminals worldwide .
It should happen .
Alas so does Tesla . Electric cars need super chargers and we can't get from our house to the beach yet on a single charge . Beach is 260 miles away . Maybe by 2017-18 Tesla will have more Super Charge Stations up and running as well as production of the Tesla-3 . Then we are customers .
The Prius Plug In we have gets 15 miles on a charge . One has to ask huh !!!But yes we bought one .
Reply

#4
Stop it. The paraphrase is no LNG for bunker fuel.
Reply

#5
Palm: << Great potential for China as they have many good plans for building more LNG import terminals. Market forces will determine whether they all get built and whether LNG as fuel for shipping pans out. Cautious optimism for my very long IOC shares. >>

As the proud author of the dumbest SHU post ever, I appreciate you posting this information and giving your view.
The move towards using LNG for shipping is gaining momentum worldwide. Scandinavia has been leading the way.

Singapore has been doing a lot since 2013 concerning technical standards and procedures:

http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/global_navig...131107.xml

http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/global_navig...150930.xml

LNG for maritime use will be huge in the coming decades.
Bunker Fuel is really crap stuff and spews enormous amounts of pollutants across the globe ... it will be phased out as soon as practical.

Cough, cough .... still recuperating from a trip to Shanghai.
Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply

#6
The reason bunker fuel is nasty is because it's cheap. That's the point. Fuel for shipping is a major expense and they would use coal if they could.
Reply

#7
The options for NEW ships are:

1. Design the engines and boilers to use Bunker Fuel and spew enormous quantities of SOx - - - status quo
2. Use Bunker Fuel and include SOx Scrubbers on the ships - - - expensive and not very practical to operate and maintain at sea
3. Use coal ... you're right Putz, it's not available at ports. Even if it were, the new ships would need HUGE storage holds
4. Use low sulfur liquid hydrocarbon fuels which still pollute, but at lower levels than Bunker
5. Use LNG which is priced at Btu parity to liquid fuels; and has the lowest carbon footprint among fuel options
6. Use "renewables" but I don't think it's possible to provide the large MW requirements of a ship

Recent research has been focused on using LNG for fuel on ships other than LNG tankers. These studies show that LNG stands out in terms of emissions reduction and reduced operational costs.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...4213003861

Some economic incentives have been shown to be advantageous to running an LNG propulsion system. When certain systems such as waste heat recovery (using waste heat to do work rather than dissipate) are added to the power plant, significant savings can be observed. One study shows that an LNG engine with a WHR system saves money compared to a diesel engine with WHR. There is a higher initial investment cost but it is a cost efficient method and environmentally sound one.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...0414000156
Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)