Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Article
#31
Art,

That's fair; we can agree to disagree. Just to clarify I was very concerned when OSH trumped Hession by buying the Pac LNG, and I voiced my concern several times on this forum. I was told I was over-reacting and Hession knew what he was doing and made a wise choice not over-paying. I called "bull" on that and voiced concern several more times that he had screwed up. In my mind one of IOC's strongest cards besides the resources was being another PNG company doing anither development.

Hession (as I pointed out) was clearly caught off guard as in Dec 2013 and Jan 2014 he cockily stated things were going well with Pac LNG negotiations and gave at least 2 different dates that the deal would be closed. Of course he never got it done, and IOC had to scramble. If I knew it, Hession knew it. But he would never admit that; he couldn't. But again, we can disagree.

I find it equally counter-factual that Hession nearly from day one had this great evil plan to dismantle IOC piece by piece solely for his and his BOD's gain.

The time for great alarm IMO should have started in Jan 2013, but instead people here said it would be fine. Hession said arbitration would be done in June 2013 and OSH would have to be happy with its minority share and watch as IOC and Total executed the SPA and great riches would be had. If so, why did Total act so ambivalent and report such low number expectations with Ant? That's factual and everyone here howled at Total and OSH. Clearly that was just silliness on Total and OSH's parts. Clearly.
Reply

#32

'Palm' pid='71390' datel Wrote:...The time for great alarm IMO should have started in Jan 2013, but instead people here said it would be fine. Hession said arbitration would be done in June 2013 and OSH would have to be happy with its minority share and watch as IOC and Total executed the SPA and great riches would be had. If so, why did Total act so ambivalent and report such low number expectations with Ant? That's factual and everyone here howled at Total and OSH. Clearly that was just silliness on Total and OSH's parts. Clearly.

Palm, I think your dates are a little off, you mean 2014, dont you? Wink

Reply

#33
Yep, sorry. Watching game and falling asleep typing.
Reply

#34
Was IOC really so short of cash? If they did nothing 36% of Antelope would have become a LOT more valuable as long there was ~10Tcfe?
Reply

#35
That check has been in the mail for about a year now. Still hasn't hit the account. Funny how that keeps happening.

How long did it take IOC to blow through $800 million or so in cash/credit and another $xx million in carried costs?
Reply

#36
I guess that's what I'm saying. The buck stops at MH AND the BOD. There is NO excuse for selling out now.
Reply

#37
I keep reading that, but have yet to read the plan for how once MH and the BOD are stopped, IOC will survive and thrive. Who will quickly come in and have the credibility and ability to take it to the promised land?
Reply

#38

'Palm' pid='71399' datel Wrote:I keep reading that, but have yet to read the plan for how once MH and the BOD are stopped, IOC will survive and thrive. Who will quickly come in and have the credibility and ability to take it to the promised land?

Palm, patience, a few more days Smile

Reply

#39
Hope so. Maybe Henry will come back in?
Reply

#40
OSH takes it to the promised land and MH gets 30 pieces of silver?
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)