Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What will Total Do?
#1
TOTAL WILD CARD

The big question for both ExxonMobil and Oil Search is what will Total do.

The French company owns a 40.1 percent stake in Elk-Antelope and is the operator, with InterOil the next biggest holder at 36.5 percent.

Total has outlined plans to build its own LNG project in Papua New Guinea, something that may prove impossible if ExxonMobil and Oil Search believe their interests lie with expanding the existing facility.

It's worth bearing in mind that even with Papua New Guinea's superior cost structure, a new LNG plant would struggle to be viable in the current environment of low prices.

It's possible that all parties could end up working together, but it may be more practical to find a way to buy out Total's position in Elk-Antelope.

The attitude of the PNG government will also be important, as it will have to be convinced that a brownfield expansion of the existing LNG plant is a better long-term bet than trying to build a second, greenfield operation.

As can be seen, there are many loose ends still to tie up, but ExxonMobil appears to be making a strong bid for quality assets with its eyes firmly on the long term.

If it all works out, this could be a great example of a resource company doing what commentators always say they should be doing, namely buying good assets at the bottom of the market and seeking ways to exploit them in a cost-effective manner.

Resource companies have correctly copped criticism when they do expensive acquisitions at the top of the commodity cycle, so they deserve kudos when they buy when the market looks bleak.
Reply

#2
And there is NO bottom lower than zero, which is where Triceratops, Bobcat and Raptor are valued along with the 20-40 other prospects that have been "high graded" over the past two years at a cost of tens if not hundreds of millions of (our) dollars.

Here's my dream scenario:

Sell PRL15 at $65/share
Fire Hession and his board
Hire Mulacek and his board
Proceed with development of the "valueless" property as the born again IOC.
Reply

#3

'ArtM72' pid='74194' datel Wrote:And there is NO bottom lower than zero, which is where Triceratops, Bobcat and Raptor are valued along with the 20-40 other prospects that have been "high graded" over the past two years at a cost of tens if not hundreds of millions of (our) dollars. Here's my dream scenario: Sell PRL15 at $65/share Fire Hession and his board Hire Mulacek and his board Proceed with development of the "valueless" property as the born again IOC.

Art, my concern is that if we took the suggested direction and new IOC discovers more gas, it is back to stranded gas again.  With no local markets and no LNG plant ownership, we are at the mercy of PNG LNG.  I would only do this if we cut a deal with XOM on a given gas price minimum that we could sell to them.

Reply

#4

'will2bgreat' pid='74197' datel Wrote:

'ArtM72' pid='74194' datel Wrote:And there is NO bottom lower than zero, which is where Triceratops, Bobcat and Raptor are valued along with the 20-40 other prospects that have been "high graded" over the past two years at a cost of tens if not hundreds of millions of (our) dollars. Here's my dream scenario: Sell PRL15 at $65/share Fire Hession and his board Hire Mulacek and his board Proceed with development of the "valueless" property as the born again IOC.

Art, my concern is that if we took the suggested direction and new IOC discovers more gas, it is back to stranded gas again.  With no local markets and no LNG plant ownership, we are at the mercy of PNG LNG.  I would only do this if we cut a deal with XOM on a given gas price minimum that we could sell to them.

Will - Yeah, you're right.  We would have to sell to Total.  A sale to XOM would leave us in the situation you describe.

Reply

#5

Here's my hunch inspired from observing XOM in 3rd world places.  XOM wants to be the only LNG operator in PNG forever.  This way whatever happens in the govt, XOM is their only path to exporting LNG.  This gives XOM tremendous power to deal with whatever treacherous thing the gov't might do.  XOM plays hardball with dictators.  Example Venezuela.  They just walked out.  Look at Venezuela - circular firing squad there.

Somehow there will end up being one big plant and XOM will operate.  I think there is a reasonable chance of that outcome.  This low price LNG market works in their favor.  Will OSH be next on their shopping list?   That makes it a little easier to push TOT out.

Does anyone have the JOA between TOT and IOC?  I think JOA structures in the US at least in the GoM allow partners in a field to take their share of the HCs in kind.  I wouldn't expect such a clause in the IOC/TOT JOA, but if it is there, then TOT is TOasT.

Reply

#6
Kaliboo - Of course, a Total acquisition of IOC might leave XOM with a single plant, unable to expand due to a lack of feedstock. Your question about taking shares "in kind" is interesting. That would likely allow OSH to meet its obligations to feed PNG LNG from E/A with its share of PRL 15. Either way the winner of IOC has a much brighter future in PNG.

Quite some time ago this Board considered such a situation. It was concluded by some that all were best served by an independent IOC. Maybe that conclusion still holds true.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)