Post Courier last night:
|
"This followed a current tussle between the parties involved, InterOil and Royal Dutch Shell with InterOil having no room for any possible deals over the Gulf LNG project in PNG but discussion are continuing." |
Implication is Gulf LNG is configured. XOM/JKM?
If so, Shell would need to out bid XOM/JKM or take a minor slice of the project. That is unlikely. Shell's cheap and their public comments on IOC's talks reiterates that. The initial report of Shell in talks with IOC pointed to both LNG opportunities and exploration licenses. If I were Shell, I'd forego Gulf LNG and T-2 and pursue ppl236 drilling JV and plop a big LNG project at napanapa, only some 100 miles from likely reefs in ppl236. IOC could 'compromise' and allow Shell to carry IOC in exploration and plant construction with payment coming from IOC's proceeds. It is the land of the unexpected afterall. This "no data room access' talk could well be the seismic data, not E/A or T-2. Collin yesterday did say this:
..."We are continuing to work with the investment banks on the sell down process, where we are looking to sell down a portion of our interest in the Elk/Antelope field and other prospecting licenses, in addition to selecting an LNG operator and the sell down of our interest in the PNG-LNG joint venture."...
IOC looks to have more gas than any Gulf LNG can ever process, even with an XOM off-take as their subsea pipe is sized to feed PNG LNG 6 tom with 3 ton expansion I believe. Where else will that PPL 236 gas go for processing as it makes no sense to pipe it back inland to the Gulf when napanapa is nearby.

