Posts: 308
Threads: 31
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
16
sorry petro , great minds think alike , I posted at the same time
Posts: 308
Threads: 31
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
16
Rather strange this Petro , don't you agree ?
IOC pushing forward could only happen :
- Gulf approval NEC
- SD deal done
Because what Bank would lend with so many and important Birds in the Air
So whats in the bush ? What did they forget to tell us ?
Posts: 308
Threads: 31
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
16
yes , Treeborowski (holder of the Lenin Cross) and even if IOC could get a loan without :
- Nec approval
- SD deal
Why would they want it , with deals done the cost of these loans and conditions would be much much favorable , banks always love to loan money to those that don't really need it
so just wait a couple of weeks
My conclusion must be (if article is true ) that all is done
Lets have the birds in the bush as well please
Posts: 575
Threads: 49
Joined: Dec 2011
09-28-2012, 08:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2012, 08:48 PM by ValueSleuth.)
A $100 million refinery loan has been discussed as having been in process for a long time and was NEVER discussed by IOC as contingent on NEC approval of the Gulf project, SDs, SMs, operator selection, or anything of the like that you are suggesting as a precondition to the bankers.
In fact, if the alleged preconditions are met, who needs the refinery loan, anyway? It is a means of filling a cash flow void to continue work -- PRIOR to approvals and the receipt of gobs of cash from a SD.
Let's not get in fantaslyland, here.
VS
Posts: 308
Threads: 31
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
16
no but VS , a drilling would be very dependent on IOC going forward with the Gulf project
But besides that do you really think Banks do not know the position IOC is in ? and the limited time IOC has to get stuff done
All , yes even the refinery hinges on IOC getting deals/permits done perhaps not in the legal sense but just common sense
Posts: 6,851
Threads: 697
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
441
Good news for many reasons. This will be with the new rig which is supposed to be able to drill deeper. It's been said for a long time that Ant 3 could be the best yet at Ant. Like you are saying they wouldn't do this without absolute certainty of having funds lined up. We may hear about that yet today or early next week.
Let er rip Mr Holland!!
Posts: 6,851
Threads: 697
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
441
My guess is that the GABP Summit 2 prompted this action. The BOD was supposedly to meet Thursday night and would have discussed many things in addition to the proposals from the IBs. There well could have been discussions on the loan facility ("all in favor say Aye"), the spudding of Ant 3 ("There being no further questions, all in favor say "Aye", opposed will be shot"), and possibly other items.
After the GABP Summit 2 attendees discussed this with the BOD and also gave their approval it was time to move forward. Especially after an updated visual acuity lecture by Tusker. This year his only "aid" was Tusker beer and he really likes what he saw. These seismics are well known and if you think they buzzed down through T2 quickly, wait and see how fast Ant 3 goes. Could be a record bore.