Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proposal by National gov to revamp DPE; MRA supports
#1

We all know the DPE has had massive problems over the years getting things done. Now the National government is considering overhauling DPE and patterning it after MRA. MRA supports this move.

"MRA-type structure eyed for Dept of Petroleum and Energy

Source:
The National, Thursday 29th of November, 2012
THE PNG Chamber of Mines and Petroleum is fully supportive of the national government’s decision to review the Department of Petroleum and Energy and implement a Mineral Resources Authority-type structure.
The chamber, in an information paper on PNG’s oil and gas industry released yesterday, said it appreciated successes notched up by the MRA in administering the regulatory regimes for mining activities.
“For some time, there had been concern within the industry about decision-making with regards to the granting of petroleum exploration licences, and the rules governing petroleum retention licences,” it said.
“Greater transparency is required in the processes applied by the petroleum regulatory body and a move towards an MRA-type structure is seen as beneficial in this regard.
“This concern is reflected in the 2012 report of the authoritative Canadian-based Fraser Institute, which downgrades PNG as a destination for international petroleum investment.
“The report states that PNG is among a number of countries where barriers to investment had increased in the past year.”
The chamber also believes the successful execution of the PNG LNG project will demonstrate that the country is an attractive destination for investment
It said progress to date on the project had encouraged renewed interest in exploration and a number of other gas developments were under evaluation.
“Although crude oil production and exports had been declining steadily for many years, PNG is on the cusp of seeing significant increases in production capacity,” it said.
“Besides an additional 20,000 barrels a day of condensate coming on stream in 2014 with the start-up of the PNG LNG project, condensate production is also proposed in the next three to five years from the Stanley and Elevala-Ketu fields in Western and from the InterOil operations in Gulf province.”
The chamber said like the national government, PNG’s oil and gas industry was keen to see the sector contribute positively to the country’s social and economic development.
“This requires a policy framework that supports transparency and accountability in line with best international practice,” it said.
“In this regard, the chamber and its members are fully supportive of the national government’s ‘platform for action’ agenda drawn up at its Alotau post-election meeting.
“The chamber welcomes the national government decision to review current arrangements with landowners and the Department of Petroleum Energy and Department of National Planning, to ensure that the benefits prescribed in the project agreement with regards to royalties and infrastructure grants achieve their outcomes
“The chamber also welcomes the decision to consult with foreign investors and landowners when reviewing the Mining and Oil and Gas acts.”
Reply

#2
Palm, do you think this could have anything to do with the recent selloff? That ppl are expecting more delays as the Dept is overhauled? I don't think it's a valid argument but just wondering
Reply

#3
No idea Tx; my gut is this is one of the reasons for O'Neill to mandate the two groups to work with IOC on the project. Get te right people involved from the start and hammer it out. If someone on committee doesn't perform, kick his butt out and find someone that will get it done. DPE has not functioned properly ever and licensees have complained for years. I think our project is te first of the new way.
Reply

#4
Sure looks to me like another detour for IOC. Might not be so, but it IS an item of potential consequence the shorts don't have to make up for a change.
Reply

#5
DPE has representation on both committees appointed by O'Neill and NEC. If you read the O&G Act the Minister has power to do what needs to be done. This reorganization will not affect current negotiations. The Act also designates others who have authority to finalize a project. They are all involved with these committees. Any reorganization will take place over several months and O'Neill will not allow something like this to slow down important projects.

This is only good LT for PNG; the comments by the MRA Director speak to this.
Reply

#6

'ArtM72' pid='13480' datel Wrote:Sure looks to me like another detour for IOC. Might not be so, but it IS an item of potential consequence the shorts don't have to make up for a change.

I could be flawed in my reasoning but when I look at the Exxon project experiencing cost increases, I think I read that it means PNG will have to wait longer for dividends and royalties from Exxon.  Therefore I think the government must seek other sources of revenue to plug that hole.  And by extension this must mean the Gulf LNG project as where else are they able to find revenue for the government?  They cannot tax income unless there is income to tax.  They cannot tax businesses that do not exist.  I think investors need to pay attention but cannot get wrapped up in the day to day.

I thank the people that created this board.  It is refreshing not to have to read crazy messages.

Arthur

Reply

#7
Arthur- This is why O'Neil stated get it going after NEC approval.They need the revenue.Its why IOC can start small and grow. It's also how IOC can maximize cash flow to shareholders.Keep as much of the project as possible.Sell as little as you need to.By maxing cash flow part of that profit flows into the PNG treasury.Which builds more roads and electrical plants.All works together
Reply

#8
If you want to see what the MRA director is referring to, here is a window; he mentions transparency. MRA has it DPE does not.
MRA website:
http://www.mra.gov.pg/

DPE website:
http://www.petroleum.gov.pg/ So transparent you can't even see it. DPE offices always closed and undermanned. Don't pay utility bills, etc etc

Nice DPE facebook page though:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Department...5106241734 Oooooops, not yet
Reply

#9
Will Duma speak on Monday?? Not saying hes the problem ,but his dept stinks in the management dept. Wouldn't Duma be in charge of day to day things like staff for the phones, paying electrical bills, approving licenses.?He can blame others though we can all agree. Who will take the fall for this dysfunctional dept and for taking of those bribes and feeding false info investors.??
Reply

#10
Is it me or could this be a huge upside for us, I mean HUGE.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)