Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Down Goes Woodside's Browse Project
#1


Woodside cancels plans for LNG processing plant at James Price Point


Woodside

Woodside has decided not to go ahead with a LNG processing plant at James Price Point. Source: AFP

ENERGY giant Woodside has reportedly scrapped plans for its controversial $45 billion Browse joint-venture at James Price Point near Broome.

WA Premier Colin Barnett said this afternoon that he had not been informed of the decision.

Asked by Opposition leader Mark McGowan if he had been advised by Woodside that the project had been rejected by the consortium, Mr Barnett today told Parliament it was not for him to divulge market-sensitive information.

The Sunday Times revealed in January that the proposed LNG hub in the Kimberley was unlikely to proceed because of escalating costs that threatened its profitability.

The Woodside joint venture, which had been due to announce a decision before June, has decided against proceeding with the onshore hub at James Price Point, which has attracted fierce opposition from environmentalists and many locals.

Digital Pass $1 for first 28 Days

The decision has torpedoed a $1.5 billion benefits package negotiated with native title claimants, the Goolarabooloo Jabirr Jabirr, although some compensation may be negotiated.

PerthNow understands the final decision not to proceed came after a meeting on Monday night.

Greens MP Robin Chapple called on the state government to rescind the Browse Land Agreement Act.

"If it doesn't, the sword of Damocles will hang over the Kimberley for the next 10 years,'' he said in a statement.

"It is a clear victory that Woodside and their partners have seen sense, but the state government continues to hold the Kimberley to ransom while this Act continues to operate.''

The project has been hotly debated in WA, with Mr Barnett arguing the LNG must be processed onshore to maximise benefits to WA and particularly local Aboriginals. 

Broome is a town divided over the project - while there is support for it, some believe the LNG should be processed offshore, while others do not want it to go ahead at all.

Just yesterday, Royal Dutch Shell's Ann Pickard restated the organisation's preference for floating LNG - arguing it would put WA at the forefront of innovation in the industry.

Mr Barnett is bitterly opposed to the floating LNG option, saying WA would miss out on thousands of construction jobs and royalties.

Recently-appointed Federal Resources Minister Gary Gray has previously voiced his support for the floating technology.

Broome Chamber of Commerce executive officer Maryanne Peterson said several contractors had been told not to proceed with work, such as ground clearing.
 
"(Woodside) have decided not to proceed with some activities that they were going to undertake prior to FID (final investment decision)," she said.
 
"We don't know whether this work is just being postponed or whether they already had enough information collected to make a decision - we don't know what it really means."

A State Government spokeswoman said there was nothing to say on the matter and said questions should be directed to Woodside, who refused to comment today.

Reply

#2


Shell boss warns on costs


Kim Macdonald, The West AustralianApril 11, 2013, 7:19 am

Shell Australia boss Ann Pickard. Picture: Steve Ferrier/The West Australian.

Shell Australia boss Ann Pickard has called for more innovation to tackle energy needs as the global population is tipped to grow by 1.5 million people - the size of Perth - every seven days for the next 40 years.

Speaking at a business function yesterday, Ms Pickard said WA was well placed to cater for the increased energy demand, with Shell modelling predicting it will triple by 2050 when the global population hits 9 billion.

But despite WA's proximity to energy-hungry Asia, she said Australia suffered from high costs and infrastructure challenges.

Ms Pickard yesterday repeated her support for floating LNG facilities, ahead of an imminent decision on the Woodside-led $40 billion Browse project, claiming it was the type of innovation that would help keep Australia competitive.

"Thanks to the discoveries in East Africa, thanks to US and Canadian LNG coming into the market, right now Australia is starting to look really expensive," she told the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce. "Gas landed into Tokyo Bay, from the Gulf of Mexico at today's prices of $10. Gas from offshore WA landed into Tokyo Bay, from much shorter distances, at $12.

"So what are we going to do to find a way to monetise this wonderful gas we have offshore and get it to market," she said.

"It's things like floating LNG that will revolutionise it and keep Australia competitive."

Ms Pickard said that Perth would not be able to compete with low-cost countries on so-called "grunt work" associated with the industry, but that through innovation, it could develop as a hub for "high-tech sexy jobs" in the sector.

She called on the Federal Government to offer better incentives for research and development programs, and to prioritise education, in a bid to boost innovation.

"We need to ensure that we are setting Australia up for success - Australia is at a crossroads," she said.

"Putting the right long-term policy and frameworks in place will ensure Australia can compete confidently in a very competitive global market."

Reply

#3
Must have been some impasse
Reply

#4

'Tree' pid='20551' datel Wrote:


Woodside cancels plans for LNG processing plant at James Price Point


Woodside

Woodside has decided not to go ahead with a LNG processing plant at James Price Point. Source: AFP

ENERGY giant Woodside has reportedly scrapped plans for its controversial $45 billion Browse joint-venture at James Price Point near Broome.

WA Premier Colin Barnett said this afternoon that he had not been informed of the decision.

Asked by Opposition leader Mark McGowan if he had been advised by Woodside that the project had been rejected by the consortium, Mr Barnett today told Parliament it was not for him to divulge market-sensitive information.

The Sunday Times revealed in January that the proposed LNG hub in the Kimberley was unlikely to proceed because of escalating costs that threatened its profitability.

The Woodside joint venture, which had been due to announce a decision before June, has decided against proceeding with the onshore hub at James Price Point, which has attracted fierce opposition from environmentalists and many locals.

Digital Pass $1 for first 28 Days

The decision has torpedoed a $1.5 billion benefits package negotiated with native title claimants, the Goolarabooloo Jabirr Jabirr, although some compensation may be negotiated.

PerthNow understands the final decision not to proceed came after a meeting on Monday night.

Greens MP Robin Chapple called on the state government to rescind the Browse Land Agreement Act.

"If it doesn't, the sword of Damocles will hang over the Kimberley for the next 10 years,'' he said in a statement.

"It is a clear victory that Woodside and their partners have seen sense, but the state government continues to hold the Kimberley to ransom while this Act continues to operate.''

The project has been hotly debated in WA, with Mr Barnett arguing the LNG must be processed onshore to maximise benefits to WA and particularly local Aboriginals. 

Broome is a town divided over the project - while there is support for it, some believe the LNG should be processed offshore, while others do not want it to go ahead at all.

Just yesterday, Royal Dutch Shell's Ann Pickard restated the organisation's preference for floating LNG - arguing it would put WA at the forefront of innovation in the industry.

Mr Barnett is bitterly opposed to the floating LNG option, saying WA would miss out on thousands of construction jobs and royalties.

Recently-appointed Federal Resources Minister Gary Gray has previously voiced his support for the floating technology.


 
"(Woodside) have decided not to proceed with some activities that they were going to undertake prior to FID (final investment decision)," she said.
 
"We don't know whether this work is just being postponed or whether they already had enough information collected to make a decision - we don't know what it really means."

A State Government spokeswoman said there was nothing to say on the matter and said questions should be directed to Woodside, who refused to comment today.

oing.

One the gound factors?

"Brome Chamber of Commerce executive officer Maryanne Peterson said several contractors had been told not to proceed with work, such as ground clearing."

Would appear that it is just the opposite case in the Gulf Province of PNG.

Bright future when above ground and below ground come togeather on the ground.

Kinda sounds like a Tap-Root that rings like a front door bell.

One spectrum of the three senses that people do not have.

Toot Toot

<img src=" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" />

Reply

#5

'Palm' pid='20555' datel Wrote:Must have been some impasse

Well, future forward meet Henery Hub !

<img src=" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" />

Reply

#6

oing.[/quote]

One the gound factors?

"Brome Chamber of Commerce executive officer Maryanne Peterson said several contractors had been told not to proceed with work, such as ground clearing."

Would appear that it is just the opposite case in the Gulf Province of PNG.

Bright future when above ground and below ground come togeather on the ground.

Kinda sounds like a Tap-Root that rings like a front door bell.

One spectrum of the three senses that people do not have.

Toot Toot

<img src=" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" />

[/quote]

Tucker, doesn't this mean that there will be an even LNG supply gap in the 2016-17 window which is already 80Mtpa or so short?

Without looking, I'd imagine there were actually some JP/SK OTs involved here to backstop this bloated project.  Where are they supposed to go for OTs.

'There is now less than nowhere else for them to go'

I say, lets super-size the Gulf LNG to 3 trains here this month and start plans for an IOC plant in napnap where it belonged in the first place.  Maybe 236 could support a tidy short 36" dry gas line here as well.

Don't mess with my toot toot!

Maybe baby needs a napnap?

Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)