Posts: 12,025
Threads: 1,809
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation:
227
Source:
The National, Monday 27th May 2013
THE developer of PNG LNG, ExxonMobil, is in exclusive talks with InterOil as a potential partner to develop its Elk and Antelope gas reservoirs in Gulf.
Should the negotiations bear fruit, Gulf gas will be provide additional trains to the PNG LNG project, expand the Port Moresby processing plant and extend the project life from current 30 years to beyond 50 years.
Prime Minister Peter O’Neill last Friday announced to Parliament the decision by InterOil to start talks with ExxonMobil.
“This is an important announcement for the development of these assets, and I’m certain all stakeholders will welcome this,” O’Neill said in a statement yesterday.
“As a stakeholder, the government is pleased that InterOil and its partners are taking the next significant step towards the development of our vast natural gas resource.
“When the full potential of the gas reservoirs in the Gulf province are realised, PNG will have in place a stable revenue flow from these resources for the next 30 to 50 years,” O’Neill said.
InterOil announced last Friday that it had entered into an “exclusive negotiations” with ExxonMobil to develop the Elk and Antelope fields.
O’Neill told Parliament the exclusive negotiations would run for 60 days after which a decision was expected on whether or not a deal was reached would be announced.
InterOil advised the prime minister of the steps it was taking before it advised the market (stock exchange) last Friday (PNG time).
The prime minister told a gathering last Friday evening that the potential entry of ExxonMobil to those assets in Gulf could significantly lift production at the PNG LNG processing facility outside Port Moresby.
“At the moment we are building two trains (or processing units) at the processing site for gas from the Hela and Southern Highlands provinces. The revenue from the export of LNG from these two trains would double the size of our economy (GDP).
“If the talks are successful and ExxonMobil gains access to gas from Elk and Antelope, we will certainly add one, possible two, more trains, and our GDP would triple in size.
“This means PNG will have a stable revenue flow from its gas resources for the next 50 years or so.”
He said with global LNG demand estimated by market experts to rise to 500 tonnes a year by 2025, his government had worked hard to ensure PNG benefits fully by promoting PNG as a stable supplier of natural gas in a stable political environment with a robustly growing economy.
He recently travelled to China and Japan, where PNG gas’ big buyers are located, to meet heads of governments there and held talks with investors seeking to enter and develop PNG’s vast natural resources potential.
He is planning to travel to Indonesia next month and later to South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore.
“I’m pleased that oil and gas global majors like ExxonMobil and Total see PNG as a stable supplier of energy (gas) to the world market.
“ Their long term investment here is proof of that.
“As a government, we will continue to provide a stable political climate, a fair tax regime, and sound development policies so that our people fully benefit from the development of these resources,” he said.
Posts: 6,851
Threads: 697
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
441
05-27-2013, 12:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-27-2013, 12:27 PM by Palm.)
Nice. Thanks STP
Posts: 689
Threads: 43
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
54
I second Palm. Thanks STP.
Posts: 4,164
Threads: 1,500
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
268
1, 2 or 3 expansion trains for PNG LNG? Gulf LNG 4Mtpa start? Guess that depends on those delineation wells in PRL15. I get the feeling that IOC/XOM and others believe there is much more than 10 T's between PRL15 and TRI. Maybe an official comment by Rex this week.
Exxon Mobil Corporation Annual Shareholder Meeting
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9:00 a.m. CT
Location Morton H. Meyerson Symphony Center
2301 Flora Street
Dallas, TX US
Posts: 690
Threads: 41
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
87
Any thoughts on this piece of the above article bc it goes against what I have heard:
"O’Neill told Parliament the exclusive negotiations would run for 60 days after which a decision was expected on whether or not a deal was reached would be announced."
Posts: 6,851
Threads: 697
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
441
May 29th?!! Didn't IOC change something that's effective May 29th?
Posts: 1,080
Threads: 26
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
137
'Tree' pid='23153' datel Wrote:1, 2 or 3 expansion trains for PNG LNG? Gulf LNG 4Mtpa start? Guess that depends on those delineation wells in PRL15. I get the feeling that IOC/XOM and others believe there is much more than 10 T's between PRL15 and TRI. Maybe an official comment by Rex this week. Exxon Mobil Corporation Annual Shareholder Meeting Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9:00 a.m. CT Location Morton H. Meyerson Symphony Center 2301 Flora Street Dallas, TX US
Whoa there Cowboy... I think some folks shoud start getting out the pencils and figure out how much gas you need to run three trains for 30-50 years.
Gosh... maybe its those wispers people have been hearing the last two years. Estamates of PNG Gas Resources are woefully wrong.
Try on some boots with room for 60 TCF.
Also... nice mention of Exxon and Total. Did I leave anybody out?
Toot Toot
" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" />
Posts: 8,568
Threads: 1,342
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
380
The 60 days is when the deal closes not when its announced.
Posts: 53
Threads: 8
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
19
'TxPm' pid='23154' datel Wrote:Any thoughts on this piece of the above article bc it goes against what I have heard: "O’Neill told Parliament the exclusive negotiations would run for 60 days after which a decision was expected on whether or not a deal was reached would be announced."
Two thoughts, which revolve around when 'exclusivity' began:
1. If it began last week with O'Neill sharing info with Parliment, then we are looking at late July plus however many days it takes for the unidentified decision makers to decide and announce.
2. Or, exclusivity could have begun sooner than the announcement given last week, which means a final decision could be announced earlier. (I don't recall in anything that was posted a specific date for when exclusivity began.)
If #1, I'd expect more drawn out stock/option trading games.
Posts: 4,164
Threads: 1,500
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
268
Well let's figure this out General George Tusker.
XOM's needs:
3 trains @ 3.5 Mtpa for 50 yrs. = 525 Mt production
1 Tcf = 21 Mt production
525/21 = 25T required
God forbid if there are 2 new trains ax XOM forecasts. That's 700 Mt production.
700/21 = 33.3 T required.
Heck, there may be enough left for a nifty 8mtpa plant in Gulf LNG still. Maybe a moduar one working on a royalty?
And then there are all those other pearls.
We must have more gas than production plants..........maybe we need to line up another one of those mighty soon.
|