Posts: 690
Threads: 41
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
87
I think you are reading this wrong. They are saying they have no plans to operate it themselves. That doesnt mean there wont be another LNG plant in our future outside of PNG LNG it just means we wont be operating it. We will leave that to the big boys since thats clearly what the govt wants
Posts: 6,851
Threads: 697
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
441
Exactly Tx. They have been hammered in the past for hinting that they will operate an LNG plant. PNG has said "no". This is being made clear to wipe that from the slate. They will partner with accepted operators, explore and operate their downstream.
Posts: 690
Threads: 41
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
87
Let me counter that by asking is a fundamental shift bad? Look at where OSH's current market cap is compared to IOC's and they arent operating any plants they are non-operator owners like it appears we are now going to be. While this may be a different course I for one am excited about it. IOC's value lies underground and this new strategy seems to be focused on creating value from those assets much quicker than the old strategy. If what we all heard was true and there were 5-6 bidders for E/A that leaves 4 to 5 losers that we can go back to about exploring Wahoo and our other fields. Once all of those fields start being declared reserves on our balance sheet you will see the pps skyrocket
Posts: 757
Threads: 97
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
102
IOC was NEVER going to be an LNG plant operator. Phil might have not understood that but the government essentially forbid that per the 2009 PA. Otherwise they would be using EWC modules not a la Phil.
Now you are just reading on paper.
Posts: 190
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation:
46
It clearly says "non-operated LNG". No change - just less BS. Short and sweet. Still no deal details.
Posts: 8,568
Threads: 1,342
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
380
Dr Hession states Exxon details later on call