Wasn't but a few months ago that Blair's 'source' said word on the PNG streets was Shell was tipped to win the bidding. There is no vindication for a sloppy confusing article based upon 'hearsay'. Blair was right this time.
**********
|
Vindication
|
|
08-21-2013, 08:17 PM
Wasn't but a few months ago that Blair's 'source' said word on the PNG streets was Shell was tipped to win the bidding. There is no vindication for a sloppy confusing article based upon 'hearsay'. Blair was right this time.
**********
08-21-2013, 08:23 PM
It wasn't just what he wrote, it was how it was written and the headline claiming talks were "dead." This was what was picked up by international media outlets and did damage to a major PNG company, and thus to PNG itself. He is not vindicated for his tabloid-esque headlines. It is not about just having the information, it is conveying it responsibly. That is something I learned in my 9th grade journalism class in high school. The NY times, WSJ, or even the Austin Chronicle would never have worded a misleading title that way.
Sorry Blair, no vindication my friend.
08-21-2013, 08:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-21-2013, 08:50 PM by cybersssss.)
AND...by the way... the title to your new article "vindication" is another jump-to-conclusions title. Maybe we should change the name of your publication to PNGIndustryBLOG....that is where this type of "journalism" is appropriate. Is this an opinion piece? If so, state that and your title is acceptable. Not as a piece of news. Stick to the facts.
08-21-2013, 08:49 PM
'cybersssss' pid='27747' dateline='<a href="tel:1377081 Wrote: Maybe his attempt at vindication but reality will not escape the lawyers |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|