[quote='Resourcearb' pid='28045' dateline='1377652885']
I believe this confirms that Exxon has diverted its focus from P'nyang underpinning a 3rd or 4th train to Elk/Antelope supplying the PNG LNG expansion. The purchase of a 50% stake in PPL 269 from NGE would have provided Exxon with a cheap option to expand its resources surrounding P'nyang, and its decision not to close this deal could be an important positive datapoint. Why would Exxon have conducted due diligence on PPL 269 and indicated its desire to proceed with the proposed transaction, then suddenly pull out? Were there really insurmountable disagreements on commercial matters with Talisman? Even if there were some disagreements with Talisman, if Exxon believed that P'nyang contained 3+ Tcfe of resources that would underpin an additional PNG LNG train, it's hard to imagine it wouldn't have consummated this transaction with NGE. Maybe the proposed NGE transaction was just a ploy by Exxon to make InterOil think it had other options? Maybe the deal between Exxon and InterOil is effectively done, so the ploy has now been dropped?
With P'nyang being the most prospectivel field in which to develop a significant resource outside of PRL 15 (or InterOil's PPL's), Exxon seems to be screaming to the world that it expects to close a deal with InterOil.
***********
That's the positive spin, and it's quite plausible, but I also agree with Palm that, until we have a definitive deal, it is possible that the exact same story could be written tomorrow with IOC substituted for NGE. I'm guessing NGE shareholders might have been just as confident of a deal with XOM (prior to that announcement) as we are. It's time to stop talking about doing something...and time to actually do it. Let's go, IOC.