Posts: 12,025
Threads: 1,809
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation:
227
Thanks for that. They'll live, it's idiotic that this was necessary, perhaps they can add it to the bill when they sue for damages. Oops, they've already done that..
Posts: 278
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
17
Bummer. $1million is a $0.01-0.02 hit to eps over the course of a year. It will not affect 3q #'s but will affect eps going forward.
Posts: 12,025
Threads: 1,809
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation:
227
["You might want to look at articles by Toro and Treasurehunter on seeking alpha. They have a broad comp set and valuation metrics."]
And NQ was busting their combs in the 20s, go figure what they do now..
Posts: 1,598
Threads: 195
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
303
My guess is they may have been able to negotiate a short term withdrawal of the $100 million without a penalty in return for assurances that the money would be re-deposited in due course
Drivel Maven with Personality
Posts: 341
Threads: 22
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
5
short term withdrawal of 100M? that seems farfetched. The whole point of the term deposit is they're going to use your money to invest that why they give you that interest rate. If they give it back to you, then it would defeat the purpose.
Posts: 1,598
Threads: 195
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
303
Banks make deals with preferred clients all the time mate. This isn't a $10,000 term deposit that you made. It's $100 million! If it were me, I'd cut NQ some slack for a few months if they promised to re-deposit the bundles of cash again.
If not then NQ loses the penalty but won't go back to this bank ever again.
Drivel Maven with Personality