Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NQ Mobile on Bloomberg today
#1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaA0edmTSZs

Reply

#2

Wow.  How clueless is she? ( rhetorical)

Reply

#3

She clearly knows nothing about the company and probably has read nothing except excerpts from the MW report.

Reply

#4

'SamAdams' pid='30749' datel Wrote:

Wow.  How clueless is she? ( rhetorical)

Unfortunate part of this is that all these commentators are doing is repeating what MW wants them to repeat and have put in their minds. They haven't even bothered to look at the company presentation, just jumped in without much understanding of the issues involved. How come they didnt mention Level 2 cash issue to Carson ?

They literally fed MW the things he wanted to focus on. How come they didn't ask him, are you prepared to go to jail if this is not proven ?

No understanding on business practices, wants them to name all the customers so that half of them close down the business relation with NQ. They really expect the China Mobile, which has got multi billion dollars revenue to come out and talk about a content provider who might be generating less than 10 basis point of their revenue.

It's disguting that these people can't even provide a neutral commentory, they are already taking sides. Atleast the lady at fox business was more neutral.

Reply

#5

'roxron9' pid='30752' datel Wrote:

'SamAdams' pid='30749' datel Wrote:

Wow.  How clueless is she? ( rhetorical)

Unfortunate part of this is that all these commentators are doing is repeating what MW wants them to repeat and have put in their minds. They haven't even bothered to look at the company presentation, just jumped in without much understanding of the issues involved. How come they didnt mention Level 2 cash issue to Carson ?

They literally fed MW the things he wanted to focus on. How come they didn't ask him, are you prepared to go to jail if this is not proven ?

No understanding on business practices, wants them to name all the customers so that half of them close down the business relation with NQ. They really expect the China Mobile, which has got multi billion dollars revenue to come out and talk about a content provider who might be generating less than 10 basis point of their revenue.

It's disguting that these people can't even provide a neutral commentory, they are already taking sides. Atleast the lady at fox business was more neutral.

Please leave a comment on the you tube in support.

Reply

#6
I didnt get to catch the live interview yesterday but this was the most biased interview I have seen Bloomberg conduct in quite some time. Emily Chang didnt have a clue about the company or what they do...maybe someone should explain to her how NQ's business model works...the part that pissed me off the most is when she asks Omar if the balance sheet looked clean when he joined the company and if he maybe didnt understand their business model. Maybe im just arrogant but if I was Omar I would take this comment as a direct insult to my intelligence. Where does Carson Block or Emily Chang get off asking Omar about hoa understanding of the industry when they have basically Zero experience in the industry and Omar has spent his entire carecer in the industry for large companies like Samsung
Reply

#7
Yes, Emily Chang basically asked these questions because Block suggested them (that Omar might not be on top of things) and she wanted his reply. I don't think it was malicious (but I could be wrong), but it was ill prepared and the result wasn't good.
Reply

#8

She must have studied at the Herb Greenberg school of Journalism.  Scandal always sells better than plain vanilla business stories, even when there is no scandal.. Amazing how many in the media are afraid to even question the motives of guys like BlocK or Ackman.

Reply

#9
What is really unforgivable is that they went with a camera crew to the Yidatong office and they (as far as I know, correct me if I'm wrong) haven't aired this, at least not yet.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)