Guys we are the few more educated buyers, there has to be something more we can do to push this stock in the right direction. I'm on Yahoo Message boards trying my best to get the right point across. Instead of sitting around lets do something! These shorts are pushing, but we have to try to sway them in the right direction...
|
Doing our DD to get the facts out to the retail consumer
|
|
12-12-2013, 12:54 PM
12-12-2013, 01:37 PM
'mockbae63' pid='34095' datel Wrote: im working on something. i hope others are as well.
12-12-2013, 03:48 PM
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-11...cmpid=yhoo
“The company has very strong revenue growth, and it’s good for U.S. investors who are looking to getting access to growth in domestic China with huge potential,” Josef Schuster, the founder of IPOX Schuster LLC in Chicago, an IPO research firm, said by phone yesterday. “Institutional investors have digested those kind of negative news and they are looking more like it’s an individual IPO.”
12-12-2013, 11:38 PM
'tradestar2012' pid='34097' datel Wrote: Congrats, Tradestar, your article is now officially an SA article!
12-13-2013, 12:43 AM
Congrats! Stock still fighting to get from under water. You definetly did your due diligence.
12-13-2013, 12:52 AM
Yes, good work, Tradestar.
12-13-2013, 01:29 AM
Guys please help with Yahoo message board. If anyone else has more articles they can write. The company is doing everything in their power. We invested our money because we believe in the company and sometimes that just not enough. Its time we put our hands to work.
12-13-2013, 02:18 AM
Glad to see your article published rather than "stashed" in the blogs... I have a few questions on the audit results of the case studies: In General, how detailed are the reports? Do they address specific accusations? Has anyone ever tried to attack the credibility of these reports? Thanks in advance!
12-13-2013, 02:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-13-2013, 02:41 AM by tradestar2012.)
(12-13-2013, 02:18 AM)RacerX Wrote:
For FMCN and EDU, the reports were pretty detailed. For ONP, the report was a bit more abbreviated but did manage to go point by point refuting short claims. Its worthy to note that in some cases, the answers to short allegations were not definitive no fraud, but more on the lines of no evidence of fraud or inconclusive to determine if there is fraud but should have further disclosure provided to eliminate conflict.
12-13-2013, 06:55 AM
Amazing cant wait to see it!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

