So what's happens to the P/E now?

[jft310]

The current price earrings ratio is 11-12 and we now have $520 million coming into the coffers as a long term gain for 2014 and next year we will receive the Total resource payment for what Morgan Stanley stated could be $2 Billion in cash . Their number. The P/E ratio goes way down during the next 12 months, and cash on hand balloons. This is all before any farm agreement proceeds on the leases which Wall Street estimates before a find could yield another $300 million.

Wall Street will like this NEW Interoil and will be looking to pick up cheap shares as weak retail investors sell out . Look at the percentage institutional ownership and watch it grow as a percent to total over the next 12 months.

[ebster123]

As the cash on hand increases toward $1 Billion and we are streamlining our business to be more of a less cumbersome vertically based business we become a nice package to be taken out. Time will tell...

[Tusker]

The current price earrings ratio is 11-12 and we now have $520 million coming into the coffers as a long term gain for 2014 and next year we will receive the Total resource payment for what Morgan Stanley stated could be $2 Billion in cash . Their number. The P/E ratio goes way down during the next 12 months, and cash on hand balloons. This is all before any farm agreement proceeds on the leases which Wall Street estimates before a find could yield another $300 million.

Wall Street will like this NEW Interoil and will be looking to pick up cheap shares as weak retail investors sell out . Look at the percentage institutional ownership and watch it grow as a percent to total over the next 12 months.

Well, I will take perspective note of what MH views in future.  There still is that "Stratigic Exploration Partner" out there. Wonder what variable interests my be brought into obit with that probability.

Togeather we are stronger.

" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" style="font-size: 12px;" />

[jft310]

Tusker together we are stronger because we all see the same info but we process it differently based on our backgrounds. Thus those different perspectives add value . I do agree with Tree some take the time and read what's written and then add value what's frustrating is those that don't take the time to read and understand and post without reading and don't add value to our forum.

I implore all to listen to the calls and read the reports to improve this forum. Together we will know more that way.

[ebster123]

JFT, you are like the kid in the playground that irritates the other kids so much asking for the swing they just give it to him and move on to a new game. You are pathetic. Get off your mantra and move on. You have some information which is truly of value to the board and then you are a nitpicking, badgering dope. I am tired of you insistence to make a point. I am moving on to a new swing....

[CAC]

Tusker together we are stronger because we all see the same info but we process it differently based on our backgrounds. Thus those different perspectives add value . I do agree with Tree some take the time and read what's written and then add value what's frustrating is those that don't take the time to read and understand and post without reading and don't add value to our forum.

I implore all to listen to the calls and read the reports to improve this forum. Together we will know more that way.

******************************

It's equally frustrating to read post after post containing overinflated (and often flat-out incorrect) comments (like today's incorrect and irresponsible statement that PET predicted 80-90% chance of sucess on all three wells).  There is value, JFT, in trying to maintain some level of "credibility" in what you post.  It is arguably even more important than whatever benefit you think is supplied by all the puffery.

[jft310]

Tusker together we are stronger because we all see the same info but we process it differently based on our backgrounds. Thus those different perspectives add value . I do agree with Tree some take the time and read what's written and then add value what's frustrating is those that don't take the time to read and understand and post without reading and don't add value to our forum.

I implore all to listen to the calls and read the reports to improve this forum. Together we will know more that way.

******************************

It's equally frustrating to read post after post containing overinflated (and often flat-out incorrect) comments (like today's incorrect and irresponsible statement that PET predicted 80-90% chance of sucess on all three wells).  There is value, JFT, in trying to maintain some level of "credibility" in what you post.  It is arguably even more important than whatever benefit you think is supplied by all the puffery.

i luv people who recreate history . Go back and  look at PETs  drill estimates . Hoho. It's on this board or just post without looking

Which is exacting what STP and CAC just did.

[Movieguy]

JFT, you are like the kid in the playground that irritates the other kids so much asking for the swing they just give it to him and move on to a new game. You are pathetic. Get off your mantra and move on. You have some information which is truly of value to the board and then you are a nitpicking, badgering dope. I am tired of you insistence to make a point. I am moving on to a new swing....

Eb, I likely agree with you more often than I agree with JFT, but your post above was really uncalled for, and not in the spirit of this forum.  JFT has added a lot of good info, and everyone is entitled to their opinions.  Cheerleading is not the worst thing, and his conclusions always derive from facts, even if those facts get colored in a rosy hue.   I think we all would appreciate analysis and even pure opinons, but not personal attacks on other members.

[Tusker]

JFT, you are like the kid in the playground that irritates the other kids so much asking for the swing they just give it to him and move on to a new game. You are pathetic. Get off your mantra and move on. You have some information which is truly of value to the board and then you are a nitpicking, badgering dope. I am tired of you insistence to make a point. I am moving on to a new swing....

Perhaps we may view this playground ride as a swingset on top of a teeder todder above a ossculating mary go round.  Recall riding that one myself.

:-) v (-:

[CAC]

Tusker together we are stronger because we all see the same info but we process it differently based on our backgrounds. Thus those different perspectives add value . I do agree with Tree some take the time and read what's written and then add value what's frustrating is those that don't take the time to read and understand and post without reading and don't add value to our forum.

I implore all to listen to the calls and read the reports to improve this forum. Together we will know more that way.

******************************

It's equally frustrating to read post after post containing overinflated (and often flat-out incorrect) comments (like today's incorrect and irresponsible statement that PET predicted 80-90% chance of sucess on all three wells).  There is value, JFT, in trying to maintain some level of "credibility" in what you post.  It is arguably even more important than whatever benefit you think is supplied by all the puffery.

i luv people who recreate history . Go back and  look at PETs  drill estimates . Hoho. It's on this board or just post without looking

Which is exacting what STP and CAC just did.

**************

We read his drill estimates the same way.  Admin just knows how to properly apply the numbers to arrive at a sound conclusion...whereas you apparently do not.  The chance of all three wells being successful, based on PET's individual well predictions, is not at all what you claimed.  It would actually be 57%.  Can you now see/admit your error?  Credibility please...