Posts: 435
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
88
Because apparently this stock cannot take it. Closing price after the debacle of Dec. 6, 2013 $55.50. Share price after one year and a few days after closing the deal with Total and getting a rather sizeable check $51.58.
I have to agree with CAC in the Bobcat thread. We were promised better than this. Some here continue to spin the negative into positive, change the argument to fit their agenda and it's old. I haven't posted in quite awhile, but this is frustrating. $51.58. Over one year after the Transformational deal that the genius at the helm put together for we shareholders. Even more amazing is that talk of a buyout on this board is met with derision by deluded investors who still think 2 and 3 hundred per share.
Posts: 890
Threads: 95
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
117
Relax grasshopper, she will turn around again, for some strange reason.
Just trade the bugger!
Posts: 354
Threads: 59
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
57
(12-12-2014, 03:29 AM)Petrovale Wrote: Relax grasshopper, she will turn around again, for some strange reason.
Just trade the bugger!
I sold 100
Posts: 12,025
Threads: 1,809
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation:
227
'jdeo1969' pid='53091' datel Wrote:
Because apparently this stock cannot take it. Closing price after the debacle of Dec. 6, 2013 $55.50. Share price after one year and a few days after closing the deal with Total and getting a rather sizeable check $51.58.
I have to agree with CAC in the Bobcat thread. We were promised better than this. Some here continue to spin the negative into positive, change the argument to fit their agenda and it's old. I haven't posted in quite awhile, but this is frustrating. $51.58. Over one year after the Transformational deal that the genius at the helm put together for we shareholders. Even more amazing is that talk of a buyout on this board is met with derision by deluded investors who still think 2 and 3 hundred per share.
Yes, it's inexcusable they made these discoveries public, or they shouldn't have waisted the time and money to discover them in the first place. They should also have snuffed Total, and Exxon, and everybody else, and everything would have been ok, I guess..
Posts: 379
Threads: 157
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
41
'admin' pid='53097' datel Wrote:
'jdeo1969' pid='53091' datel Wrote:
Because apparently this stock cannot take it. Closing price after the debacle of Dec. 6, 2013 $55.50. Share price after one year and a few days after closing the deal with Total and getting a rather sizeable check $51.58.
I have to agree with CAC in the Bobcat thread. We were promised better than this. Some here continue to spin the negative into positive, change the argument to fit their agenda and it's old. I haven't posted in quite awhile, but this is frustrating. $51.58. Over one year after the Transformational deal that the genius at the helm put together for we shareholders. Even more amazing is that talk of a buyout on this board is met with derision by deluded investors who still think 2 and 3 hundred per share.
Yes, it's inexcusable they made these discoveries public, or they shouldn't have waisted the time and money to discover them in the first place. They should also have snuffed Total, and Exxon, and everybody else, and everything would have been ok, I guess..
perhaps someone knows the results of the arbritation. That's the only thing I can think of. f....crazy
Posts: 2,505
Threads: 219
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
109
There is a mention of a water contact, no mention of porosity, they missed the sweet spot, the flare is little?
Posts: 435
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
88
'admin' pid='53097' datel Wrote:
'jdeo1969' pid='53091' datel Wrote:
Because apparently this stock cannot take it. Closing price after the debacle of Dec. 6, 2013 $55.50. Share price after one year and a few days after closing the deal with Total and getting a rather sizeable check $51.58.
I have to agree with CAC in the Bobcat thread. We were promised better than this. Some here continue to spin the negative into positive, change the argument to fit their agenda and it's old. I haven't posted in quite awhile, but this is frustrating. $51.58. Over one year after the Transformational deal that the genius at the helm put together for we shareholders. Even more amazing is that talk of a buyout on this board is met with derision by deluded investors who still think 2 and 3 hundred per share.
Yes, it's inexcusable they made these discoveries public, or they shouldn't have waisted the time and money to discover them in the first place. They should also have snuffed Total, and Exxon, and everybody else, and everything would have been ok, I guess..
Say what you want Admin, for whatever reason the stock cannot move up. It makes ZERO difference as to why. We can debate that until we are blue in the face. I am not happy with the stock's performance, and your glib response doesn;t change a damned thing. But if you are happy with things in the last 12 months as a shareholder, you have truly set a very low bar for your investments.
Posts: 2,505
Threads: 219
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
109
IOC did what it said it would. Yes the drilling time was poor and they stumbled at Wahoo. They batted100% on the exploration and started A4 on time. A5 we still have to see. What does WS dislike so much??? I wish I knew.
Posts: 12,025
Threads: 1,809
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation:
227
'Putncalls' pid='53099' datel Wrote:There is a mention of a water contact, no mention of porosity, they missed the sweet spot, the flare is little?
If a discovery was expected you could be onto something here. There isn't any mention of a reef or dolomite, but then again, this isn't the sweet spot either, apparently.
I usually don't pay too much attention to short-term stock price swings, as the information these provide is more limited than many people seem to think, but today is quite a marked development on reasoably high volume.
Perhaps it's just simply that the discovery isn't sufficiently spectacular to generate much new buying and shorts taking advantage of that, and the general weakness in energy these days.
Posts: 435
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
88
'admin' pid='53102' datel Wrote:
'Putncalls' pid='53099' datel Wrote:There is a mention of a water contact, no mention of porosity, they missed the sweet spot, the flare is little?
If a discovery was expected you could be onto something here. There isn't any mention of a reef or dolomite, but then again, this isn't the sweet spot either, apparently.
I usually don't pay too much attention to short-term stock price swings, as the information these provide is more limited than many people seem to think, but today is quite a marked development on reasoably high volume.
Perhaps it's just simply that the discovery isn't sufficiently spectacular to generate much new buying and shorts taking advantage of that, and the general weakness in energy these days.
Or perhaps we must face the fact that wall street in general is not interested in this stock. perhaps crediubility issues from the past are rearing their ugly head, but I donl;t see any other way than to just say it. When you own a stock that drops 7% on good news (or certainly not BAD news) you own a crappy investment. I think after 5 years i am finally catching on.
|
