Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How IOC can claim a discovery at both Raptor and Bobcat
#1
Raptor-1

http://www.interoil.com/iocfiles/documen...0FINAL.pdf page 16

1. We hit the high end of the Raptor structure where the well flared gas and condensate.
2. We have a seal, reservoir rock, a trap and gas and condensate.
3. Seismic data indicates a massive structure up dip and down dip from the well.
4. From the transcript http://www.interoil.com/iocfiles/documen..._FINAL.pdf of December 3rd Laurie Brown states: “We have flowed gas and condensate to surface. Moreover, pressure testing supports the presence of a multi-hundred meter hydrocarbon column, beyond the 200m of reservoir interval encountered in the well, and logs indicate a highly fractured reservoir system to help deliver it.”

We do not know how large the field is because we do not know the depth of the gas/water contact. The pressure data will give them an indication of the thickness of the gas column if we assume a normally pressured aquifer or if we knew the true pressure of the aquifer. At this time we do not know the true pressure of the aquifer.

So all of the data indicates that we have a massive structure filled with gas and condensate. So this qualified to be called a discovery.

Bobcat-1

Bobcat is on the other end of the spectrum. Instead of hitting the reservoir rock at the high point we hit it at or near the gas water contact. We were high enough to prove the reservoir contains “hydrocarbons” which were flared at the surface on a drill stem test. So that proves:
1. We have a reservoir that contains hydrocarbons at the transition zone between the hydrocarbons and the water (aquifer). So we know the up dip portion of the reservoir will be filled with hydrocarbons from the hydrocarbon/water contact to the highest point of the structure.
2. According to the Press Release: http://www.interoil.com/iocfiles/documen...covery.pdf

“Recently acquired seismic indicates the crest of the structure lies several kilometers west of the
current well location and is several hundred meters higher than the current well depth.”

So the test data and seismic data acquired since Bobcat-1 was spud indicate that we have a massive structure at least several kilometers long and with a hydrocarbon column several hundred meters thick.

That qualifies as being defined as a discovery.

Now we just need to get some additional seismic data, locate those “sweet spots” and drill a few appraisal wells at both of these discoveries.
Reply

#2

Pet,

I do hope we end up proving up these discoveries as you describe.  However, I think what IOC has done is comply with the O&G Act which requires a license holder to notify the government of any petroleum discovery to put them on notice that something may be coming.  Failure to do so can subject the license holder to fines.  Here is that section of the Act:

32. DISCOVERY OF PETROLEUM TO BE NOTIFIED.

(1) Where petroleum is discovered in a licence area, the tenement holder

  1. (a)  shall immediately inform the Director of the discovery; and

  2. (b)  shall, within a period of three days after the date of the discovery, furnish to the Minister written particulars of the discovery.

(2) Where petroleum is discovered in a licence area, the Director may, from time to time, by instrument served on the tenement holder, direct the tenement holder to furnish to him, within the period specified in the instrument, written particulars of

  1. (a)  the chemical composition and physical properties of the petroleum; and

  2. (b)  the nature of the subsoil in which the petroleum occurs; and

  3. (c)  any other matters relating to the discovery that are specified by the Director in the instrument.

(3) A person to whom a direction is given under Subsection (2) who fails or refuses to comply with the direction is guilty of an offence.

Penalty: A fine not exceeding K5,000.00. 

Reply

#3

(12-18-2014, 02:00 PM)Palm Wrote:

Pet,

I do hope we end up proving up these discoveries as you describe.  However, I think what IOC has done is comply with the O&G Act which requires a license holder to notify the government of any petroleum discovery to put them on notice that something may be coming.  Failure to do so can subject the license holder to fines.  Here is that section of the Act:

32. DISCOVERY OF PETROLEUM TO BE NOTIFIED.

(1) Where petroleum is discovered in a licence area, the tenement holder

  1. (a)  shall immediately inform the Director of the discovery; and

  2. (b)  shall, within a period of three days after the date of the discovery, furnish to the Minister written particulars of the discovery.

(2) Where petroleum is discovered in a licence area, the Director may, from time to time, by instrument served on the tenement holder, direct the tenement holder to furnish to him, within the period specified in the instrument, written particulars of

  1. (a)  the chemical composition and physical properties of the petroleum; and

  2. (b)  the nature of the subsoil in which the petroleum occurs; and

  3. (c)  any other matters relating to the discovery that are specified by the Director in the instrument.

(3) A person to whom a direction is given under Subsection (2) who fails or refuses to comply with the direction is guilty of an offence.

Penalty: A fine not exceeding K5,000.00. 

I was not referring to anything to do with the legal requirements. Just trying to explain in simple terms why we have two significant discoveries even though the initial testing was not too much to write home about.

Reply

#4
Yep; understood. Just making sure others here understand the legality of what IOC had/has to do at each stage of development.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)