Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Antelope in Oil Search Transcripts
#1

[Abrupt Start]

...and may I wish you a very warm welcome to Oil Search's Results Presentation for the 2014 Fiscal Year. Standing

here 12 months ago, it was not difficult to see that 2014 was going to be a very big year for the company. We had set

ambitious targets for safety, for production, for costs and for earnings. We had the PNG LNG project in its final stages

of construction and we're about to enter the commissioning phase.

We just announced the acquisition of the Pac LNG group of companies, which allowed us to enter the Elk/Antelope

joint venture as a joint venture partner. And we flagged at this meeting a major strategy review reflecting the changing

status and profile of the company, the results of which were announced later in the year in October.

(2)

We also, as Chairman said, purchased a significant interest in the Elk/Antelope fields, and that obviously provides a

very strong resource base to support another LNG development and we are moving forward with the appraisal of that

resource and looking at how that resource can be tied in to a plant in PNG.

(3&4)

Turning to the investment outlook for this year. Our full year capital expenditure forecast is going to range around

somewhere around US$600 million mark. That's certainly the lowest spend we've seen since FID for the LNG project

in 2009. LNG construction spend does tail off this year, following the acquisition of Antelope drilling and the

construction of LNG office facilities in Port Moresby.

Our exploration spend in 2015, we anticipate to be similar to the 2014 spend if you exclude the large outlay for the

PRL 15 licenses and that includes ongoing drilling for the Antelope appraisal wells, site prep for the P'nyang drilling,

and ongoing appraisal drilling and testing in the Taza block in Kurdistan.

(5)

Our net 2C contingent gas resources have increased by 54% following the booking of just over 1.2 tcf at Elk/Antelope

reflecting our acquisition in PRL 15 early last year. There's also an addition from the Finders discovery drilled in the

Gulf of Papua. Overall, our reserve statement confirms that we've got long life assets and they are underpinned by

quality reserves and resources.

(6&7)

Thank you, Paul, for that good news story and good morning, ladies and gentlemen. As you've heard this morning, Oil

Search's development focus remains the delivery of high returning LNG projects in PNG. The success of the PNG LNG

project and the cash flows it will generate together with the disciplined approach to our investment that Stephen has

highlighted will ensure that funds are available to underpin the next phase of Oil Search's growth.

The discovered but undeveloped resource base in PNG, primarily P'nyang and Elk/Antelope fields, can supply at least

two new LNG trains. With moderate drillbit success through 2015, we can possibly be involved in three trains.

Oil Search, as you're aware, is uniquely positioned in PNG. We hold a material interest in each of those resources that

are expected to deliver new LNG to the market early in the next decade. The developments can meet the forecast

mid-term supply shortage as less competitive LNG projects are either deferred or shelved indefinitely. The P'nyang and

Elk/Antelope developments have been rigorously stress-tested in the current price environment and both expansion and

greenfield alternatives are economically attractive.

(8-12)

In the Gulf Hub, Antelope 4 and Antelope 5 are currently drilling. Provisionally, they have encountered top reservoir. It

is expected that a further appraisal well, Antelope 6, will be spudded before mid-year to define the eastern flank of the

field.

Resource certification will follow this drilling program and confirm is it a one or two train development in the Gulf.

Additionally, the Antelope Deep or Antelope South prospect will target a sizable accumulation just at the south of the

main field.

(13,14,&15)

Moving onto PRL 15, in the Gulf Hub, the recently announced result of the arbitration process denied Oil Search a

preemptive right. A majority decision ruled that Total were a party to the JOA, but they've had no rights in the JOA or

in the PRL 15 license. However, we are working cooperatively to resolve this matter through open dialogue with our

joint venture partners.

On the technical front, we are close, as I mentioned, to obtaining reservoir information on Antelope 5 and Antelope 6.

Provisional top reservoir picks by operator are between 30 meters and 50 meters high to Oil Search's mapping, but it's

still early days and we need to confirm reservoir and reservoir quality through further drilling and logging.

Antelope 6 is likely to complete the appraisal program and will target an area to the east to firm up support structure

and phases as we move away from existing take points. Our joint venture Concept Select decision is targeted later in

2015 as is an Oil Search certification of the resources in Elk/Antelope.

Reply

#2
I believe the following statement especially important: " The P'nyang and Elk/Antelope developments have been rigorously stress-tested in the current price environment and both expansion and greenfield alternatives are economically attractive."
Reply

#3
(16-19) I'm going to focus in two areas; one will be in PNG obviously and the second main slide I'm going to show will be
focusing in Kurdistan looking at the appraisal program around Taza. As Ian has already mentioned, the output of our
strategic review really helped us to focus in two key areas, two gas hubs so the northwestern highland gas hub focused
on P'nyang potential development and then also a Gulf Hub focused on our entry to Elk and Antelope.

In the Gulf Hub, Ian has touched on the Antelope appraisal wells 4 and 5. Antelope 6 well we hope would be a further
appraisal well on the eastern flank of that field, but we see an additional prospect to the south of the main Antelope
field that we're calling Antelope Deep and hopefully that's also a well that we'll see through the joint venture and we'll
spud this year. And again if that one is successful, it has the potential for significant expansion of the project there.

(20)New ventures, overall, will be a lower priority, given the amount of work that we've currently got on our fleet. I mean,
there's phenomenal amount of work to do around P'nyang, there's a phenomenal amount of work still to do around Elk
and Antelope, of course. And that's going to draw the major focus for our exploration appraisal team.

(21)Lot of work to do on those but the potential expansion of the PNG LNG and the development of Elk/Antelope remains
the focus. Both have robust project economics and remain very attractive in this environment. We also obviously will
continue to focus on PNG country stability initiatives and that remains a priority. Through all this we can fund those

(22-26): Morning and thanks, Peter. Dale Koenders from Citigroup. Peter, I was just hopping if you
could provide a comment post sort of arbitration on Antelope. Previously, at the Strategy Day you flagged the
opportunity for US$3 billion of CapEx synergies and potential acceleration of project, the first production in 2019. Is it
fair to assume that with targeted FID into 2017 maybe that timing is aggressive, but the CapEx is still achievable?
: Look, there's a lot of work to do on Elk/Antelope and clearly the outcome, which didn't
give us preemptive rights, was a disappointment to us. At the end of the day though we had a choice. There was a very
complex legal outcome to this. And we had a choice to embark on sort of the legal dispute, which, in our view, would have caused delay to the project
moving forward. And we, I think, sensibly took a view that there was a better commercial outcome if we didn't get
preemptive right, so let's move on. And I think that's also the same attitude from Total and from InterOil.

There is no doubt that having this dispute out there has increased Total and InterOil's appetite to accelerate
development and there have also been discussions between the Elk/Antelope joint venture and the PNG LNG joint
venture to look at ways potentially of how the fields might look at synergies and how they may or may not come
together.
Overall, though, the most important thing on Elk/Antelope at the moment is to understand the resource base, which will
then set the size and shape of what we may build there. And once we understand that we can better define the
development optic and how much that might cost.
But again just emphasizing, with the low oil price environment, whatever way possible to improve the development of
both PNG LNG and also Elk/Antelope clearly needs to be focused by the two joint ventures and we certainly will play
as much a role as possible to push for those synergies to be followed. But we think we've taken a pragmatic view
having not got preemptive rights to move forward and move forward rapidly.

(27-32) : Okay. And last question regarding Antelope appraisal. It seems like the Antelope 4 and Antelope 5
wells will give you sufficient confidence around besides the resource to a large extent. And that there would be this
propensity to move into early design work, ahead of getting any sort of independent reserves, that resource
certification? Is that the current thinking? You don't really need the Antelope 6 well to move forward with early
design?
: Ian, would you like to comment on that?
: Certainly. I think I mentioned during the presentation it's still early days. We're obviously
encouraged by the well results coming in from fruition a little high to our prognosis. We do, as a joint venture, see the
Antelope 6 well as being required to as Peter said to define the tank.
I think it's important we don't look to charge ahead through a Concept Select decision until we properly define the
resource. And Antelope 6 will spud on the back of Antelope 4 and Antelope 5. So it's not too long before we'll get those
well results.
(33)
: Thanks, Peter. Yes, clearly, there has been one or two issues on the rig out there. Clearly, the joint
venture is looking to help the operator where we actually can. Clearly, Oil Search has a lot of drilling experience in
PNG. So we are helping the operator in that space. So it is a very much collaborative approach.
We clearly won't drill ahead as a joint venture unless we think the rig is safe and can safely drill through the reservoir.
So the operator has been undertaking remedial work, which seems to be heading in the right direction. So I think the
expectation through the joint venture and also through government channels is we'll be back to drilling very shortly on
Antelope 4.
(34-39) : Good morning, Peter – afternoon, Peter, and rest of the team. Look, just on the back of [ph] Mark's (01:12:18)
question and Kirit, I just want to understand, do you need Antelope 6 for resource certification, because PRL 15
[indiscernible] (01:12:26) thinking early or late November. So is there some sort of hesitation to commit to Antelope 6
based on rig availability or what's going on with the drilling at the moment?
And then secondly, talking about cost out in the business, one of the goal that's operating up in PNG tends to
[indiscernible] (01:12:46) a lot of the seismic acquisition up there. So just on 269, are you happy to be sort of driving
some of that cost out in sort of the hiring licenses, and maybe if could just sort of maybe provide where some of that's
coming from sort of your contract on helicopters or where the services might be coming from?
: I'll kick the first question so Ian can answer the question on Antelope 6 and perhaps I can
probably answer the second piece myself.
: Yeah. I think it's a very timely question. I mean, our technical team are over with working with
Total and InterOil yesterday and today on signing up the location for Antelope 6 and issue results from those technical
meetings into where the joint venture is fully aligned on wanting to see an Antelope 6 and want to see it go down
within the next few months.
So I think that alignment is good and we'll get straight after it. We have the rigs as a joint venture to spud back to back,
most probably the same with Antelope Deep where what I think now will be termed Antelope South. It will also be
spudded around mid-year.
(40) So we could expect [ph] results certification this year (01:14:36)?
: Much of it depends on how quickly we can get Antelope 6 down to log possibly test and as a joint
venture incorporate those results. I think what I've mentioned earlier was towards the end of this year. Oil Search has
actually [indiscernible] (01:14:54) banned the pack sellers to undertake a certification as well and to determine whether
any upside payments, so we see that occurring towards year end.
Reply

#4
(41&42): Yeah. Morning, guys. I have questions if we can. First of all, the targeted FID date for
Elk/Antelope 2 and Antelope 3, both at the moment are targeting 2017 I guess there will be some [indiscernible]
(01:18:16) for you probably don't want to be FID projects simultaneously. I do repeat that question be if so what you
think the optimal gap to isn't fairly on that which project goes as if one goes before the other.
: I think there's no doubt that we've already had discussions around how the things may
work together. There is also no doubt as you quite rightly point out that there is a relatively limited support structures
present in the PNG government of various bits and pieces. And as far as the positive out of that is [indiscernible]
(01:18:56) and the PNG government the only joint venture partners that will represent some, well, significant almost
40% of the joint venture, will be owned by the PNG. We will certainly be looking at ways to avoid the pitfalls of two
projects moving forward exactly at the same time without combination and coordination. And as far as that's certainly
part of our ongoing discussions at this stage and as joint venture partner. So, Ian, do you want to add anything to that?

(43) Mark G. Samter>: Okay. And then just one follow-up question as well, if I can. It seems like Kurdistan reads
like it's been slightly deprioritized. Is that a fair assumption? I guess, also, is it still core in the portfolio? Well, I mean,
particularly, if it slips, it might be heading into being developed in similar timelines to Elk/Antelope and Train 3 and
would you want to take on three reasonable size projects at the same time?

(44)But as Ian says, somewhat premature. The market clearly is in some form of flux as the oil price rolls through. But I
think the bottom line is, if you look at the breakeven point of many projects around the world, PNG LNG, and
Elk/Antelope will be in the moment the top quartile of those projects and be highly competitive for any LNG I'll say.
We believe that's a bit of the case. Anyways we're a little away from serious marketing.
Reply

#5


Do not try to play the drinking game that one must take a shot every time Antelope is mentioned in the Oil Search CC. :0

Reply

#6

Gator - Many thanks for your gracious help....(especially from this old [non-technical] dinosaur) ! Sure helps folks like me a lot. Good fortune to you and yours.

Reply

#7
Good stuff; thanks Gator. Their tune on EA is certainly more positive especially now that they lost the pre-emption try and sound like it's full ahead in working with IOC/Total.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)