Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PRE raptor seisimic
#1

from march 2015 presentation - slide 39 - This may have more detail than previous, I can't recall for sure.  Sorry I couldn't figure out how to just post the one slide here.

http://www.pacificrubiales.com.co/images...tation.pdf

Reply

#2
Sure looks like they could move to the right and hit the mother load.
Reply

#3

'melmel' pid='56296' datel Wrote:

from march 2015 presentation - slide 39 - This may have more detail than previous, I can't recall for sure.  Sorry I couldn't figure out how to just post the one slide here.

http://www.pacificrubiales.com.co/images...tation.pdf

One could only wish they correct the apparent erroneous directional labelling on the seismic picture relative to the orientation of the strike line.  (Or am I still reading this all wrong?)

Reply

#4

'melmel' pid='56296' datel Wrote:

from march 2015 presentation - slide 39 - This may have more detail than previous, I can't recall for sure.  Sorry I couldn't figure out how to just post the one slide here.

http://www.pacificrubiales.com.co/images...tation.pdf

Melmel - Thank you very much for that pdf. Yes,it had a bit more detail on slide 39  than a previous map I had printed-off for my IOC file. Imo,Raptor#2 has the potential to be a "life changing" event when the well is completed. Thanks again.

Reply

#5
Another reason not to sell drilling later this year .
Reply

#6

'jft310' pid='56313' datel Wrote:Another reason not to sell drilling later this year .

Jft - Yet another thought ! As I contemplate the latest info from Melmel's find from PRE and think more about the seismics therein,and digest the earlier info about the"very wet gas" in Raptor#1,it now appears that if we have oil in the Raptor field it could well be in the Duckbill portion of tha Rap/Duc field. This would place the oil in PRL 15. If this senario turns out to be the case,then Total and OSH would probably have even bigger smiles on their faces. Kind'a interesting to think about.( especially if the field is 7 miles or so in length from NW to SE.)

Reply

#7
Wet dreams????
Reply

#8

[quote='melmel' pid='56296' dateline='1426948306']

from march 2015 presentation - slide 39 - This may have more detail than previous, I can't recall for sure.  Sorry I couldn't figure out how to just post the one slide here.

http://www.pacificrubiales.com.co/images...tation.pdf

  I was wondering why all of a sudden they decided to describe Raptor with all those accolades on the call.. Now we know why.  That is one massive and deep structure..It kinda annoys me that PRE had to show the slide but I'll take it..

Reply

#9

'Dr. Wu' pid='56354' datel Wrote:

[quote='melmel' pid='56296' dateline='1426948306']

from march 2015 presentation - slide 39 - This may have more detail than previous, I can't recall for sure.  Sorry I couldn't figure out how to just post the one slide here.

http://www.pacificrubiales.com.co/images...tation.pdf

  I was wondering why all of a sudden they decided to describe Raptor with all those accolades on the call.. Now we know why.  That is one massive and deep structure..It kinda annoys me that PRE had to show the slide but I'll take it..

Dr. Wu - I really appreciated Melmel's info from PRE. Page(or slide) 39 from their March 2015 presentation was very enlightening for me.On another thread from Pet,I commented on Dr. Hession's comments concerning Raptor. Imho, Raptor/Duckbill has a strong chance of becoming an extremely impressive field and a fine addition to IOC's assets. Hagd.

Reply

#10
IOC showed a different view of Raptor in the Q3 presentation in November.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)