Personally I'm very unhappy with IOC's policy of withholding ALL information.
If you are either happy or unhappy, send them an email. THEY WORK FOR THE COMPANY'S SHAREHOLDERS
I want to know ==> WHY are they withholding ALL information from shareholders? They claim that revealing good information will attract an unwanted takeover of the company.
WELL ... "now look what you've done Ollie." Withholding information has resulted in such a low share price that it will attract an unwanted takeover of the company AT A FIRE SALE PRICE.
IOC's own published definition of Material Information is:
QUOTE Information is deemed “material” if it could affect the market price of a security (i.e., stock, option, bond, etc.) or if a reasonable investor would attach importance to the information in deciding whether to buy, sell or hold a security. END QUOTE
IT'S IMPERATIVE THAT IOC MANAGEMENT WAKE UP FROM THEIR STUPOR AND ... FROM NOW ONWARDS ... PROVIDE SHAREHOLDERS WITH ALL MATERIAL INFORMATION AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE.
The below is material information in my view and should be disseminated:
1. Why does O'Neill say that Papua LNG will be the 3rd LNG train in the country? IOC should comment on this - - - correct or not?
2. What is the status of Wahoo drilling?
3. What is the status of Antelope 4?
4. What is the status of Triceratops 3?
5. What is the timing for making a decision on Antelope 7?
6. Why hasn't TOTAL been ensconced as Operator or the Papua LNG Project?
7. Etc and etc

