Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
InterOil denies meeting Chevron for Gulf talks
#1
Source:
The National, Thursday 7th June 2012
INTEROIL has not made comments to the media regarding Chevron or others that might be interested in the development of the Gulf LNG Project, as reported in The National yesterday.
Corporate communications officer Damaris Minikula said in light of recent media reports, InterOil was following normal government processes and was complying with protocol by responding accordingly through the government regulator, Department of Petroleum and Energy, regarding the recent notice to terminate the 2009 Liquid Niugini Gas Project Agreement.
“InterOil is waiting for the government, through the Department of Petroleum and Energy, to respond accordingly,” she said,
Meanwhile, Australian Financial Review reports that InterOil’s ambitions to develop PNG’s second LNG project appear close to collapse after a flare-up in tensions with the government over the structure of the venture.
PNG Petroleum Minister William Duma last Thursday issued a notice warning of the termination of a 2009 agreement that InterOil had with the government covering the framework for the LNG project.
He said InterOil needed to sell a majority stake in its gas resources in PNG to a major LNG operator, which would also run the LNG venture.
Relations between US-listed InterOil and the PNG government have been deteriorating over the past months in an increasingly bitter dispute over the project, which is next to be developed after ExxonMobil’s US$15.7 billion project now under construction.
InterOil and its affiliate Liquid Niugini Gas planned to develop InterOil’s Elk and Antelope gas fields using two LNG projects: an small onshore one with Australia’s Energy World Corporation and a fixed-floating one with Norway’s Flex LNG.
But the government wants instead one world-scale onshore project of at least 7.6 million tonnes per year of production, run by an internationally recognised LNG operator, along the lines of ExxonMobil’s project.
It is now advising it will terminate InterOil’s project agreement within 180 days, on the grounds that InterOil has not complied with its obligations and has breached the agreement.
“Unfortunately InterOil has for too long insisted on a development structure which is designed to only meet its objectives of controlling the asset and the pace of developing it,” Duma said in a media statement last Thursday.
“In the face of continuing obstruction of the implementation of the 2009 project agreement by InterOil and Liquid Niugini Gas Ltd I have therefore been left with no choice but to issue a notice of intention to terminate the project agreement.”
InterOil and Liquid Niugini Gas are fighting the bid by the government to cancel the project agreement.

"And maybe someday we will find , that it wasn't really wasted time"
Reply

#2
Gator - Your post hit my Google alert for IOC news immediately. I'm surprised you headlined the article as you did. From what the National article said IOC did not deny anything, it only failed to comment about any talks with Chevron. This of course would be in keeping with protocol.

This same story, as old and full of errors as it is, continues to run day after day after day in different venues. Seems to me whoever is running this show it trying to shake every share it can from any week hands out there in the retail market.

The adjacent thread about export strategies pretty much says it all. IOC might have too much gas. It is sitting on at least one, probably two and possibly several world class fields each in the 5+ TCF category. This gives good reason to take care in selldown negotiations, creates a major attraction for political graft and makes a lot of gas available to stoke the boiler rooms.

Another eight days and some significant part of the shroud of secrecy put on this project since the initial T2 DSTs should be lifted. Can't wait.
Reply

#3
I just copied the headline. Who know Google would be ready to pounce on my post. Maybe I should have titled it “InterOil worth $250 on takeover speculation”.
"And maybe someday we will find , that it wasn't really wasted time"
Reply

#4
Better, but I have a hard time not thinking E/A alone is worth $250/share. How about "IOC sells E/A and Declares $200/share Dividend"? I'd be more than happy to pay the taxes while still believing my fist remained full of winning lottery tickets :-P Dreams.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)