Opportunities in smallcaps header image 2

Silver lining?

September 15th, 2008 · 2 Comments

There might actually be a silver lining to the quite unprecedented turmoil in the financial markets. Apparently, the SEC is going to speedily implement emergency rules against naked shorting. That would be excellent news.

From Associated Press:

  • WASHINGTON (AP) — With Wall Street engulfed in crisis, the Securities and Exchange Commission is planning measures to rein in aggressive forms of short-selling that were blamed in part for the demise of Lehman Brothers and which some fear could be turned against other vulnerable companies.
  • During emergency meetings between federal officials and investment bank executives over the weekend, SEC Chairman Christopher Cox indicated to the bankers that the agency plans in a few days to impose new protections against abusive “naked” short-selling, a person familiar with the matter said Monday.
  • The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the SEC actions haven’t yet been officially announced.
  • The measures likely would include removing an exception for market makers in options on stocks from rules restricting naked short-selling, and a tightening of anti-fraud rules related to that activity, according to the person familiar with the matter.
  • Those two measures could be put in place administratively by quick approval of the SEC commissioners. Another change, reducing from 13 to five the number of days that short-sellers would have to deliver stocks after an initial failure to do so, would require a public meeting and formal vote to propose it as a new rule.
  • Short sellers bet that a stock’s price will fall so that they can profit from it. They borrow shares of the stock and sell them. If the price drops, they buy cheaper actual shares to cover the borrowed ones, pocketing the difference.
  • Naked short-selling occurs when sellers don’t even borrow the shares before selling them, and then look to cover positions immediately after the sale.
  • Some investors contend that naked short-selling, if left unchecked, would have given hedge funds and other aggressive short sellers an unfair advantage to move on to other attack victims after Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Merrill Lynch & Co. — being bought by Bank of America Corp. in a $50 billion shotgun deal — or giant insurer American International Group Inc., which reportedly appealed to the Federal Reserve for emergency funding, were likely targets.
  • New York Gov. David Paterson said Monday that AIG will be allowed to use $20 billion in assets held by its subsidiaries to provide cash needed for the company to stay in business. Paterson asked state insurance regulators to essentially allow AIG to provide a bridge loan to itself.
  • The investors have clamored for the SEC to institute another emergency order similar to its ban from mid-July to mid-August against naked short-selling of the stocks of mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and 17 large investment banks — including Lehman and Merrill.
  • The SEC’s temporary order required short sellers to actually borrow shares before selling them. By law, it could not be extended beyond Aug. 12.
  • Cox has said the order helped prevent potential “distort and short” manipulation of stocks, which occurs when rumors and misinformation are used to drive down the price of a stock that has been sold short.

It’s curious how even media have been infected. There is just not any rational argument in favour of naked short-selling, and how the article can claim that naked shorters seek to immediately cover after the sale is a mystery to us, with InterOil having failure to deliver problems for 500+ consecutive trading days..

Tags: IOC · The Markets

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Jim Tate // Sep 15, 2008 at 11:56 pm

    Lets get her done huh

  • 2 Sec considering banning (temporarily) all short selling // Sep 19, 2008 at 3:43 am

    […] might remember that in the beginning of all the present troubles we wrote an article titled “Silver lining?” We could not have thought that the lining would be this […]