Well worth reading on a day like this…
IOC: Our Thoughts on Civil Lawsuit Being Contested by the CEO
♦ IOC shares fell sharply today following a media report about a civil lawsuit being contested by the company’s Chairman and CEO Phil Mulacek from a group of former investors. The lawsuit revolves around the allocation of shares when InterOil was originally being formed approximately a decade ago, alleging that there was fraud in that process. Specifically at issue is InterOil’s purchase of the refinery that was subsequently installed in PNG. The case is set to go to trial later this year.
♦ Although the shares have obviously reacted very strongly to today’s media report, it is important to point out that the lawsuit is not new and has, in fact, been disclosed in InterOil’s past regulatory filings (see, for example, details on page 43 of the Annual Information Form for 2009). The case is titled Todd Peters et al vs. Phil Mulacek et al (284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas). Mr. Mulacek is the principal defendant, and InterOil is also named as a defendant.
♦ While we are not in a position to assess the validity, or lack thereof, of the substantive allegations, our sense is that this appears to be a “nuisance lawsuit” based on matters that allegedly took place a decade ago. InterOil’s exploration success in recent years and resulting gains in the share price have obviously made it a more tempting target from the standpoint of the plaintiffs. We believe that the most likely outcome is a settlement between the two sides, though it is difficult to gauge at this point the potential monetary value of such a settlement.
♦ Obviously, this lawsuit represents an unpleasant distraction, and some legal “overhang” for IOC shares may persist until the lawsuit’s ultimate resolution. That said, we believe that there is an element of overreaction in today’s sell-off.
We would underscore that our Market Perform rating is premised not on the legal overhang but rather our concerns about the execution and financing risk in the company’s multi-year gas commercialization roadmap, balanced by the longer-term valuation upside.

The suit may not be a threat to Interoil directly, but what does the suit say about the ethics of IOC’s CEO, if the accusations are true? If it is true that he inflated a price of an item from $250K to $15M in order to serve his own financial interests, why wouldn’t he be willing to do similarly unethical things to IOC shareholders?