Opportunities in smallcaps header image 2

The full Motley Fool post on InterOil

January 6th, 2011 · 4 Comments

Apparently they left out a few bit..

IOC Dec 2010 Motley Fool (for the full version with tables, which don’t reproduce in the version below)

Long – InterOil – IOC – $74

Investment Thesis

The value of InterOil’s (IOC) massive 9.1Tcfe of gas (independently confirmed) will be unlocked via numerous near-term catalysts that are likely to occur in 1Q2011 and 2Q2011. These catalysts will provide upside of 100%-200%+ to IOC’s current share price over the next 12 – 24 months.  We fully recognize that stating an upside of 100%-200%+ elicits immediate skepticism.  Initially, we were quite skeptical as well.  However, we believe that if you spend some time working through the analysis, you will concur with the conclusion.

InterOil (IOC) is extremely well-positioned to meet the sharply increasing liquid natural gas (LNG) demand in Asia Pacific.  Demand for LNG in the Asia Pacific region is forecast to grow from 7.8 Billion cubic feet (Bcf)/day in 2010 to over 25 Bcf/day in 2015 (26.6% CAGR).  LNG demand is being driven by the rapidly growing power generation needs of India, China and the other Asian countries and the need to reduce pollution by moving from coal-fired to gas-fired power plants.  Polluted water is inhibiting growth in China and other Asian countries.  We believe that IOC has the lowest cost gas in Asia Pacific.  In a commodity business like LNG, having the lowest cost position is the key to having a sustainable competitive advantage.

Company Description

InterOil (NYSE:  IOC) is a Canadian integrated oil and gas company.  The company’s upstream activities are conducted on 3.9mm acres of petroleum prospecting licenses in Papua New Guinea (PNG).  The key asset is their Elk/Antelope fields, which have obtained a resource estimate of 9.1Tcfe from third party assessor, GLJ.

Papua New Guinea is an under-explored frontier with world class assets strategically located on the doorstep of Asia.  PNG has been a country active in exploration of oil and gas with current investments by Exxon Mobil, Talisman, and Oil Search.

IOC Assets

IOC has 3.9mm acres in PNG.  The first site being developed in IOC’s 3.9mm acres is called Elk/Antelope.  IOC owns 58.6% of the Elk/Antelope resource (PNG government owns 22.5% and some outside investors own the remainder).   As of the end of 2009, the GLJ estimate of the Elk/Antelope resource was 9.1 Tcfe, which is 1.52 Billion Barrels Oil Equivalent (BOE).  When one includes the 2010 drilling results, which expanded the resources depth and boundaries, we believe that the 2010 resource estimate will be approximately 12Tcfe.

Additionally, there are 40 other exploration targets identified within IOC’s 3.9mm acres and 4 of these other 40 targets display reefal properties (see next section for significance of reefal properties).  For conservatism, we are assigning zero value to these other 40 targets.  That said, initial seismic results are promising for the 4 reefal targets.

IOC’s Ultra-Low Cost Position

IOC is well-positioned given that it has the lowest cost gas in Asia Pacific.  First, the company has spent approximately $430 million in exploration which has resulted in 9.1 Tcfe, or 2C resource finding costs of less than $0.05/Mcf.  Second, very few development wells will be required to extract the gas.  This is due to the fact that the Elk/Antelope is a reefal structure that is comprised of dolomite with high porosity (8% – 14%).  The Elk/Antelope structure is located in the lowlands of PNG, which is quite near the port.  IOC’s breakeven price (FOB) is $0.70 per mmbtu (assumes 12% discount rate).  Note:  1mmbtu is roughly equivalent to 1mcf.  $0.70/mmbtu is among the lowest cost (FOB) in the world, which is just above Qatar at $0.40/mmbtu.  The spot price in Asia is around $11.00/mmbtu (over 1500% higher than IOC’s breakeven FOB cost).  For reference, previously built LNG projects have a FOB breakeven price of $2.00 – $8.00/mmbtu and new proposed LNG projects are even higher.  Even if LNG demand were to slacken and spot prices in Asia fell from $11.00/mmbtu to $5.00/mmbtu, the higher cost LNG projects would be the ones that would become uneconomic.   IOC’s project would still have extremely attractive economics even in that downside scenario.  Having the lowest cost position is IOC’s key strategic advantage.

Recent Accomplishments

August 2010 – IOC and Mitsui enter into Joint Venture Operating Agreement for a condensate stripping plant.  The gas in Elk/Antelope contains about 20 barrels of condensate for every million cubic feet of gas.  These liquid condensates sell at a premium price to crude oil and are key feedstock for the production of numerous petrochemical products.  As of the end of 2009, it is estimated that Elk/Antelope holds more than 156mm barrels of condensate liquids.  Mitsui desires these condensates for its chemical businesses.  The deal dictates that Mitsui contributes $550mm to build the condensate stripping plant and can convert that $550mm investment into 2.5% ownership in the Elk/Antelope structure and the LNG facility.  The conversion option implies a value of $2.41/mcf.  The condensate stripping plant is to be operational before 1H2013.  Next step: Final Investment Decision (FID) expected before end 1Q2011.

September 2010 – Energy World Corporation (EWC) and IOC enter into a heads of agreement to construct a 2mpta (million ton per annum) land-based LNG facility in PNG.  EWC contributes $910mm in capital for 14.5% of the first 1.5Tcf of gas extracted.  Implied price paid by EWC is $3.64/mcf.  Next step: FID expected before end 2Q2011.

November 2010 – IOC completes a $280mm capital raise at $75/share.  Management and insiders buy $44mm of the deal.  IOC now is 100% financed and has all capital needed to meet FID requirements for Mitsui and EWC deals and to fund E&P of Wolverine, MuleDeer and Bwata (next high value targets).

Upcoming catalysts (1Q2011 and 2Q2011)

1)      Partial Sell-Down (2.5%) and Offtake Agreement (1Q2011 and 2Q2011).  Company has stated publicly that they expect to conclude a partial sell-down of the Elk/Antelope resource.  The sell down will likely take the form of a 2.5% sell down (putting $500M-$600M cash on the balance sheet as the project reaches production) along with a 10 – 15 year offtake agreement (approx 1mm tons/yr).

2)      Floating LNG Partnership (before end 1Q11).  We expect IOC to announce a floating LNG deal before end of 2Q2011.  Partner (Daewoo or Flex LNG/Samsung) would contribute the LNG ship for a portion of the LNG production – expect there would be minimal cash cost to IOC.

3)      Final Investment Decision (FID) and finalized condensate agreement with Mitsui (before 1Q2011)

4)      Energy World Corporation FID (before 2Q2011)

5)      End of year 2010 resource estimate update from GLJ (1Q2011) – we believe that the 2010 resource estimate will be increased from 9.1 Tcfe to approximately 12 Tcfe (based on 2010 drilling results).


IOC is trading at an enterprise value of $3.2 billion (at $74/share).  Assuming that Elk/Antelope contains 12 Tcfe, dividing the enterprise value by IOC’s ownership portion of only the Elk/Antelope resources equates to just $0.46/mcf.  This is a massive and unwarranted discount to recent Asia Pacific natural gas transactions.

Recent Asia Pacific natural gas transactions for the sale of gas resources have averaged $2.22/mcf.  The $2.22/mcf average includes transactions for less attractive coal seam resources that typically sell for around $1.00/mcf.  As mentioned above, the Elk/Antelope resource is extremely low cost due to its dolomite composition and the site’s close port proximity.  Hence, Elk/Antelope resources should sell for at least the $2.22/mcf average (likely higher).  As a reference point, Energy World is paying an implied price of $3.64/mcf for its investment.

Assume 12 Tcfe in Elk/Antelope – 12Tcfe x $2.22/mcf = $26.6 billion…$26.6 billion x 58.6% = $15.6B – value of IOC’s portion is $328/share (343% above current price of $74).  Using the price of $3.64/mcf from the EWC transaction yields a value of $538/share.  A sensitivity table is included below.  Please note: given that the $/mcf amounts are present day transaction prices, the calculation already reflects a NPV adjustment.

The above math assumes ZERO VALUE for the other 40 drilling prospects – MuleDeer, Wolverine, Bwata are 2011 targets and initial seismic analysis is encouraging.

We believe that Morgan Stanley (Evan Calio) is the most rigorous sell side analyst on IOC.  Morgan Stanley’s current risk adjusted price target is currently $135/share and his Net Asset Value is $225/share.

Weak Bear Case (and getting weaker)

1)      Company has no “proven reserves “ – We agree.  “Proven reserves” is merely a technical classification term.  IOC has a contingent resource estimate.  According to the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (COGEH), Section 5.3.2, the commercial status of the project differentiates proven reserves from contingent resources.   When the Mitsui and EWC deals reach positive FID, we expect the classification of IOC’s resources to change from “contingent resources” to “proven reserves.”

2)      Company has not produced any free cash flow yet – IOC is an E&P company.  IOC is now moving from exploration phase (which has taken 11 years and $430mm) to harvest phase.

3)      Bears believe that IOC will not get a sell down and/or offtake deal done – Given IOC’s low cost position, the richness of the condensates, the increasing LNG demand in Asia, the amount of due diligence done by Mitsui before entering into the JVOA, and the experience/history of the deal team…we feel confident that IOC will close a transaction.

4)      Vocal IOC Bear Whitney Tilson (see point 3 in the next section)

–          Sept 10, 2010 – “We’ve Never Had More Conviction and IOC is our largest bearish position“

–          Oct 27, 2010 (just 6 weeks later) – IOC does not appear in his top 12 short positions…..

IOC – Potential M&A Target and a Large Short Interest

1)      Exxon has a $15 billion LNG project in the highlands of PNG. – Exxon project is significantly higher cost due to the highland location, need to run 100s of miles of pipeline (landowner issues) and the thinner Toro sandstone where the gas is located (needs to drill 100s of wells).  Exxon could easily pay $300/share for IOC with the transaction being accretive, as it would build a single larger multi-train LNG facility and gain IOC’s deepwater port rights.

2)      China, Japan and India have all indicated a desire to acquire natural gas assets.

3)      7.09M share short interest…over 15% of the float – IOC is a complicated story.  At first pass, the stock screens like a good short.  A few hedge funds hired Barry Minkow (convicted felon and former CEO of ZZZZ Best) to conduct extensive and well-coordinated attacks on several public companies, hoping to profit by shorting their respective stocks.   IOC is one of those companies.  Minkow and his colleagues are now once again under investigation by the SEC for his short attacks over the past 2 years. “Tens of thousands of pages of court records going back nearly two years show that Minkow is again not to be trusted.  He is leveling unproven allegations against major companies, driving their stock prices down and profiting by doing so.”

Top holders – IOC is a top 10 position in their funds

1)      Soros owns 4.1M shares and also holds calls on 1.2M shares…taking total IOC position to 11.92% (Soros’s 3rd largest holding)

2)      Wells Capital now owns 11.2% after adding 113K shares last quarter (7th largest holding)

3)      7th largest holding at Kensico

4)      Fidelity increased its IOC holding by 65% in 3Q10

Where can we be wrong?

1)      Mitsui and/or EWC elect to not move forward – We feel that this is unlikely.  The head of IOC’s deal team (Henry Aldorf) has a very successful history with Mitsui.  Mr. Aldorf (former president of Marathon International) facilitated the Equatorial Guinea LNG (EG LNG) project, in which Mitsui owns an 8.5% stake.

  1. EG LNG on the Mitsui web site….
  2. Given that the “EG LNG Train 1 project is one of the fastest LNG projects – concept to first LNG, and was completed with an excellent safety record, under budget, ahead of schedule, exceeded its goals for national training and content and has been able to produce significantly more than its nameplate capacity“
  3. EWC recently stated that the IOC project is fast-tracked and that EWC sees tremendous upside from using its modular liquefaction facility approach.  EWC is partnered with Siemens and Chart Industries where Siemens is vested in the success of this newer LNG application.

2)      Elk/Ant resource is not as good as estimated – Drilling logs were done by Schlumberger, numerous core samples were analyzed by Mitsui, drilling management by Weatherford.  The complete GLJ resource estimate report has been released by IOC.  We hired external petro-geo experts to perform a detailed review of the GLJ resource estimate.  Our experts believe that the GLJ report is conservative.

3)      World falls into a severe double-dip recession and natural gas prices fall sharply – Elk/Ant is the lowest cost gas project in Asia Pacific.  LNG projects with higher cost gas will be cancelled first and IOC’s would likely be the last project cancelled.  Given the 26% annual increase in LNG demand in Asia, we view this as unlikely.

Tags: IOC

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 palmducks // Jan 6, 2011 at 11:50 pm

    The amazing thing to me is that when you see valuations for IOC, little if anything is said about the value of the condensates and NGLs. There are many very good articles that explain how the value of these assets are what make the difference between an LNG project profitable. Also, read about shale projects that are now going forward in the US and elsewhere. Based on the low NG prices alone, some are not being developed. The ones that are (Baakan, etc) have NGLs associated with the gas.

    When IOC presents the low cost of their project compared to others, it’s because of the condensates/NGLs. This is a huge value and advantage for IOC. They know it, but I think purposefully do not talk about it much. If you read their presentations, it is eluded to, but not specifically mentioned. Elk/Ant is very valuable because of this.

  • 2 Bruce // Jan 7, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    Palm, I agree. Mitsui needs the condensates for their naphta/petrochemicals business. To me and probably other IOC investors, when Mitsui committed to the IOC project focused on the liquids, the risk of the investment was reduced significantly and the likely hood of IOC pulling off the building of the infrastructure to monetize their huge find would come to fruition.

  • 3 aaron // Jan 8, 2011 at 3:30 pm


    what is the value of their condensates?
    what is NGL (natural gas liquids?)…

    what’s the value of their other projects ?
    tanx guys and good luck….

  • 4 Palmducks // Jan 11, 2011 at 4:25 am

    Aaron, if you understand that these condensates are valued with a premium to crude oil, then use Henry’s 60,000 Bpd, I’d say even Jed Clampett would be saying, “Welllll doggies!”