![]() |
|
No mention of the 2nd Plant - Printable Version +- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: No mention of the 2nd Plant (/showthread.php?tid=11030) |
No mention of the 2nd Plant - davidhmtk - 07-22-2016
"ExxonMobil will work with coventurers and the government to evaluate processing of gas from
the Elk-Antelope field by expanding the PNG LNG project. This would take advantage of
synergies offered by expansion of an existing project to realize time and cost reductions that
would benefit the PNG Treasury, the government’s holding in Oil Search, other shareholders
and landowners."
Is Total ok with this?
RE: No mention of the 2nd Plant - ArtM72 - 07-22-2016
'davidhmtk' pid='74576' datel Wrote: I think that is the billion dollar question. As I've argued elsewhere Total would be giving up its foothold in the world's fastest growing hydrocarbon market. Without a fight? Doesn't make any sense. RE: No mention of the 2nd Plant - davidhmtk - 07-22-2016
'ArtM72' pid='74580' datel Wrote: If Total is counting on the PNG gov't to demand a 2nd plant, note that the current Energy Minister, Ben Micah, joined the Opposition last week for tonight's vote of no confidence in the PNG Parliament. My read is the gov't survives and Micah is replaced. |