+- ShareholdersUnite Forums (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Companies (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: InterOil Forum (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: XOM must have been close (/showthread.php?tid=5607)
XOM must have been close - Palm - 12-18-2013
Interesting when you look through the SPA a bit. XOM def had plans for drilling Ant. In fact the caption in Annex 2 that shows the planned prospect SE of Ant2 says "Proposed Antelope XOM Wells 11-26-2013". Must not have wanted it badly enough. They were Totally outbid.
RE: XOM must have been close - Tusker - 12-18-2013
[quote='Palm' pid='34616' dateline='1387335404']
Interesting when you look through the SPA a bit. XOM def had plans for drilling Ant. In fact the caption in Annex 2 that shows the planned prospect SE of Ant2 says "Proposed Antelope XOM Wells 11-26-2013". Must not have wanted it badly enough. They were Totally outbid.
[/quote
Gosh, takes me back five years on Yazoo... South East. Has a ring to it.
Cheers
RE: XOM must have been close - Palm - 12-18-2013
Drill that sucker Tucker!!