Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PNG wants Total to develop "disputed" gas field
#34

Yes, E/A is substantially all of the firm value, based on certification.  But the new managment and company has very little credibility at this point, therefore that future value is more heavily discounted.  I won't list all the missed deadlines this year, but executing on any one builds credibility allowing the market to assign a higher present value to those payments.  Current stock price relfects doubts/uncertainty as to ultimate size and timing.  You can say al you want its worth $200, $300 or $400 but all we have is E/A right now and a mgmt team that has run into issues resolving IPI, and all three exploration wells.  That and a weak tape and here we are.  Not at the end of the qtr yet so still time on B or R but MH put himself in a corner here.  Hopefully we don't run into those issue on cert wells.  The new team hasn't realized that they need to replace Lucy as the ball holder.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: PNG wants Total to develop "disputed" gas field - by Relker - 09-25-2014, 08:43 PM
RE: PNG wants Total to develop "disputed" gas field - by Relker - 09-25-2014, 11:24 PM
RE: PNG wants Total to develop "disputed" gas field - by SamAdams - 09-26-2014, 02:54 AM
RE: PNG wants Total to develop "disputed" gas field - by Relker - 09-29-2014, 01:33 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)