LOL. Some people, it doesn't matter how hard you try to give them a gracious out, they insist on making an ass of themselves.
So admin (what's your name, BTW?), how do you reconcile the CFO's history? I can see arguing away the sketchy clients -- larger-scale clients may not want their names used in promotional releases. As far as the numbers, I mean, it's a story of exploding growth, right? So having all the numbers perfectly sync on every management statement may not be that important when even the lowest of those numbers looks really good. But having the chief financial officer fresh off a financial scandal just four years ago? That's the part I can't get past to make myself pull the trigger on this. Why would a legitimate business want to have that kind of stigma surrounding its topmost levels of leadership? What does this guy offer that makes him worth that kind of risk?
So admin (what's your name, BTW?), how do you reconcile the CFO's history? I can see arguing away the sketchy clients -- larger-scale clients may not want their names used in promotional releases. As far as the numbers, I mean, it's a story of exploding growth, right? So having all the numbers perfectly sync on every management statement may not be that important when even the lowest of those numbers looks really good. But having the chief financial officer fresh off a financial scandal just four years ago? That's the part I can't get past to make myself pull the trigger on this. Why would a legitimate business want to have that kind of stigma surrounding its topmost levels of leadership? What does this guy offer that makes him worth that kind of risk?